Contents
Why baby/mineral oil?Wet or Dry honeSome people use oil stones and wet/dry abrasives without oil. They argue that you shouldn't use a lubricant when you are trying to scratch the tool. Sounds reasonable, but it is not.As a simple counter example - why do machinists use oil when cutting metal (both when drilling and when using a metal lathe)? In fact, the oil is used to float the filings up off the surface of the abrasive. The blade then pushes the floating filings away from the part of the abrasive in use. Think of the oil as a cutting fluid. [According to Metallographic Polishing by Samuels, cutting or abrasion fluids have no effect on the rate of abrasion, but do flush the abrasion debris away from the working surface.] The idea that dry honing is somehow better than wet honing has been popularized by a book called The Razor Edge, which is discussed below. The author claimed better results using a dry fine silicon carbide stone for final honing of knives used in industrial meat cutting shops. A fine silicon carbide stone is about 240 grit. If you hone with such a coarse stone then you should expect unusual results. Unless you think that 240 grit is a suitable final honing grit, don't follow his advice. In case there is any doubt about my recommendation here: Never hone (or grind) with a dry abrasive! Of course, powered grinding is a bit different because the belt or wheel throws most of the swarf off the abrasive (and into the air and eventually into your lungs). Baby OilI use baby oil - which is a light mineral oil. Get the fragrance free variety. You can buy mineral oil, but it is often of a thicker consistency, which is almost useless in this application. The pharmacy of any large department store will have baby oil. The generic version is just fine.The advantages
Some people think that any petroleum by-product is dangerous. The Wikipedia article on mineral oil disagrees. Magnets?An alternative that seems comparable is to use a magnet! Put a magnet on the blade and the filings will stick to the blade rather than remain on the abrasive. Periodcially you remove the magnet and the filings fall off. I have some experience with this effect - something that just happened during the Norton 3X testing. For some reason, grinding on the very coarse Norton 3X papers caused the blades (all blades used in the test) to become magnetized! All the filings adhered to the blade, so did not clog the abrasive. They had to be wiped off the blades, since the blades appeared to be permanently magnetized. Unfortunately, the bits of abrasive are not magnetic and do remain in the abrasive. The abrasive becomes clogged and has to be cleaned somehow. All in all, baby oil is a much better choice. Once the honing/grinding session is over, a wipe (or a blotting up with coarser grits) with a rag and the abrasive is clean, with no dust (filings, broken abrasive) in the air.
The Razor EdgeA sharpening book written in 1985 called The Razor Edge reported comparison tests of knives sharpened on oilstones with and without oil. Those tests were said to clearly favour sharpening without oil.I have not been able to find any evidence that these claims are true. If you look at my micrographs of plane blade edges, you will find no evidence that the filings floating in the oil damage the edge. In fact, if you look at pictures of the sharpening station you can clearly see the swarf has been for the most part swept out of the active area of the abrasive. The same is true for swarf on the bench stones. I suspect that the effect they encountered may be a result of using too coarse a final honing abrasive. It is not clear what grit they used for honing - the book only mentions medium and fine abrasives. If their oil stones were Norton crystolon stones, then the fine stone was 240 grit, or about 54 microns. Their final abrasive was almost 4 times are coarse as my first abrasive. When used with oil, the broken abrasive is swept out of the honing area so the abrasive is always 240 grit. Perhaps when used without oil, the broken abrasive remains in the honing region creating a swarf, much as with Japanese water stones. This swarf may have a smaller actual grit size (larger grit number) than the stone itself, resulting in a honed surface with smaller scratches. That is what the proponents of Japanese water stones claim. In both cases (too coarse an oil stone used dry, Japanese water stones), relying on the breakdown of the abrasive to create a new finer abrasive seems more magic than science. If you don't hone long enough - how long is long enough? - you don't get the effect you need. Some people may get good results, some using almost the same technique may get poor results. With microbevels, these 3M abrasives, and a honing oil, you get consistent results - no magic. Back to the top. Can you dub the edge with abrasive papers?
How big should the glass sheet be?
NavigationThe FAQ home pagePrevious page of the FAQ - Back bevels and microbevels Next page of the FAQ - Abrasives and Steels Return to the Sharpening page. Return to the Sharpening and testing home page.
Questions? Comments? You can email me here. Back to the top. |