Queen Elizabeth

A MIDSHIPMAN’S WAR
A young man in the Mediterranean Naval War 1941 - 1943

More War Stories

previous | index of stories

The Cunningham Papers -The Mediterranean Naval War, 1939 to 42

(Naval Records Society, volume 140 - private and official correspondence)

Cunningham was impatient if people were slow and could be irritable but full of fun and liked a joke. He had good relations with Admiral Dudley Pound , the First Sea Lord. Pound was careful and not as aggressive as Cunningham. Both agreed that the Mediterranean fleet need more ship and air support. Cunningham felt that Malta was the lynchpin of the Mediterranean naval war being the base to stop the enemy supply convoys and the springboard for the invasion of Italy.

Cunningham disliked the continuous pressure he was receiving from Churchill for an offensive and called his wild schemes irksome. He was particularly annoyed at the idea to block Tripoli harbour in Libya using the battleship Barham. Churchill was frustrated that enemy ships were getting through with valuable armaments and supplies. Cunningham called it insulting, childish and totally unrealistic. He had thoughts of Gallipolli. It would be an extremely difficult operation, a waste of a battleship and could be quickly reopened. It was too simplistic. Actually, on 20 April 1941, a bombardment was carried out by three battleships and a carrier in conjunction with a Malta convoy. It was a tricky operation but was successful and some damage to the port was done.

What Cunningham needed was more RAF and Fleet Air Arm aircraft. The carrier HMS Illustrious was almost sunk by German aircaft. Air Marshall Longmore, an ex WW1 RN Air Service officer, was being helpful in providing air reconnaissance though he had heavy demands providing air defence for Greece and Crete, for Alexandria, the desert war and the Suex Canal. Cunningham was not in favour of the Greece operation but did what he could to carry the operation. He thought the defence of Crete was problematical.

He was critical of Admiral King for not attacking an enemy sea convoy carrying troops from Greece to Crete even though his force of cruisers and destroyers were well o the north of Crete and could have been delayed and subject to air attack after dawn. If these troops had been drowned it could have made the difference in holding Crete and winning the battle. It was a close run campaign. It would have been worth it even if King’s ships had been sunk.

He kept pressing for more aircraft to the annoyance of Churchill. He had worked well with General Wavell and Air Marshall Longmore. But the new replacements of General Auklinleck and Air Marshall Tedder were less amenable to his way of thinking. The number of aircraft for solely naval purposes , in Malta, the desert, Alexandria, Palestine and the Red Sea were in 40s.

The damaging of the two battleships in Alexandria harbour in 19 December 1941, was not well handled and the board of enquiry recommended that the boom was not to be opened at night except in an emergency and the size and number of harbour patrols were to be increased and the size of explosives dropped were to be larger.

Note. Once we had won the Battle of El Alamein in November 1942 and America came into the war everything changed for the better. Victory was now attainable and not a problematical hope. Cunningham was transferred to Washington in April 1943 to liaise with the Americans. He was appointed to be General Eisenhower’s deputy for naval operations for the landings in Morocco and Algeria. With his Mediterranean experienced he recommended that landings should have been planned for Tunis as well as for Algiers. It was decided that this might be too risky and was not followed up. If it had been done, it might have shortened the length of the war.

[up]

previous | index of stories


crown

© Frank Wade 1998 - 2006