![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
JL, 16 April 2008 Back at the Ranch
I don't actually live
on a ranch, but I am back. Contrary to popular
belief, not everyone in Canada lives on a ranch or in an igloo.
We have towns and cities and ATM machines and milk that comes
in
cartons and all that regular stuff. Not that I can work an
ATM
machine without getting confused but we have them. I am back
from my travels and short as they were it always feels like a trip to
the Moon. I hate traveling. I hate stuffing the
trunk of a steel cage with my belongings and hurtling through space at
60 miles an hour. I hate it even more than I hate Internet
Explorer.
I was shocked to find that the law had changed several months ago and it's no longer possible to pump gas without paying for it first. So I tried to pay for it in the store, but they wouldn't take it. I had to put my credit card into a slot in the pump and guess how much gas I needed. That just froze me to the ground in bewilderment. Guess? If I couldn't guess the right number the pump would take $100 by default. $100?! I'd never given my credit card to a gas pump before and it was not looking good. A nice lady from the store had to come out and explain it all to me, I was so distressed. That's how seldom I go anywhere. Needless to say, I am relieved to be back on terra firma in my familiar block of the world. Those of my loyal following would remember that I sent my old laptop to a cousin last Fall for him to have his first computer at the age of 67. He floundered around with it for awhile and concluded that computers are just an expensive way to do email, and since everything else costs money there's no fun at all to be had out here. He sent me daily rants on the uselessness of computers. So I sat back and waited. Something must have registered eventually because at the end of February he sent me an email that he'd bought a brand new one, shopping the way we'd all like to shop - I like that one, pack it up. A DELL all-in-one, 20" monitor, wireless, bluetooth, built-in webcam, TV, Vista Ultimate, the whole nine yards, and he's ecstatic. Another digital convert. So, he sent the laptop back to me, just in time for my travels. That's always an interesting experience, to see how different two computers can be. I didn't have time to reinstall the operating system and customize it so I just took an hour to update the security and ran. Using the laptop again reminded me of what I felt like as a kid riding horses out in the country and then getting on a single-speed bike to pedal myself home. Stunned. While I was away I had a chance to look around the web on this different resolution monitor than what I've become accustomed to. If the day ever comes that I can learn CSS and redesign my website maybe some, or all, of the problems will go away. It's not too bad here as I've simplified this website to the point that even Internet Explorer can handle most of it without manglement. Although I admit, I haven't tested all 235 pages lately. As a comparative study, here's what a JLiki page looks like in Firefox on a 1280 x 1024 monitor. ![]() Here's the same page in Internet Explorer, 1280 x 1024. Note the header needs a magnifying glass, and the left menu is oversized. ![]() And here's what it looks like on a 1024 x 768 monitor, where the center graphic is too wide for the screen but conveniently slides under the right-side menu. The magic of CSS. ![]() And here's an example of the type of thing that upsets me and it doesn't have anything to do with different resolutions, it's just Internet Explorer being a pain. It's my understanding that a standard font size for the web is '16' so that's what I have it set to in Firefox. In Internet Explorer I think it's called 'Medium. This is a screenshot of part of a page in Firefox. ![]() See how nice that is, with the ads being so unobtrusive, sitting there quietly and politely. Here's the same page screaming at you from Internet Explorer. ![]() I've fiddled with this before and it seemed the only cure would be for me to change the font to something larger on every single page to get up to speed with the ad-text and then you could set your default for the whole page smaller to keep from knocking your eyeballs out. Since that would be several weeks work, I hadn't got around to it yet. However, I just found another cure for this. All you diehard users of Internet Explorer, if you go to Tools/ Internet Options in IE7 (and maybe IE6?) and click on the General Tab and then Accessibility and untick the box that says "Ignore font sizes specified on webpages" all will be well. Not as good as Firefox, but much better. It even fixes the fonts in JLiki. ![]()
COMMENTS 17
April 2008
Well, doggies! No wonder I couldn't figure out why you kept howling & growling about IE making yur stuff look awful. (It all looked purty darned good to me all along, so I couldn't understand the why of it .... except that perhaps you'd fallen and hit your noggin on a mouse and got near-concussed or some other awful thing.) So, now you've gone and taught me somethin' else I hadn't known before. I dutifully followed your directions to fix my nasty ol' IE7 ... and lo! That li'l box was not even checked to begin with. Mystery solved. I swear, you'd have guilted me into Firefox long since, except ... I'd have to bug "the kid, aka the resident techie" into putting it on here. And she can be such a grouch! Welcome home and thanks for the grins ... again. Penny <who loves reading the JLog> 17 April 2008 After discovering the box above it did occur to me that I might be the only person in the world with it ticked. But ... Firefox is still a better browser. Ka-ching! I just made another million dollars for saying that. JL 18 April 2008 Now, now, JL, I was just puttin' a tiny virtual-elbow in your rib over the IE/Firefox thing. I look at it this way: you've got your act together better than some of us and, besides, you have an amusing way with words. There are two companies those of us who use computers and do the genealogy polka love to hate: MS and Ancestry. We may use MS products and subscribe to Ancestry, but most of us (certainly including me) get a certain amount of vicarious satisfaction in seeing somebody smack either or both of 'em around - blogwise or however! I'm bettin' you aren't the only one with a checkered box! Mine probably would have been, too, except for TK (Techie Kid who resides in my house). Last time my motherboard committed suicide and fried some otherstuff on my own infernal machine, TK rebuilt the whole shebang from the mb out. No doubt she saved me from having IE checked box syndrome as she's the one who would have un-checked it, not me. I had no clue it was there until you told me. Keep up the good work. You're teachin' and entertaining us at the same time, I really do learn a lot from you. Who knows, I may even have to ask TK where all the little hootchits (boxes that need to be ticked and unticked and mysterious settings that have to be changed here & there) are if I switch to FF. Penny 18 April 2008 Firefox has hootchits but they're not weird hootchits. They're obvious and helpful hootchits. I had to keep reading those words over and over to myself slowly: Ignore-font-sizes-specified-on-webpages. Who would want to do that? If you want a different size to the page fonts you can hold down your Ctrl key and scroll your middle mouse button up and down. But to have the choice to mangle the aesthetic balance of carefully constructed webpages, do we really need this? The ticked/unticked box lives under a button called "Accessibility" and officially Accessibility relates to "features [that] make Internet Explorer more accessible for people with disabilities". Obviously, I'm missing something so for fear of being furtherly insensitive, I'm just going to let this simmer. For myself all I can say is Hallelujah, my box is unticked! And likewise, I hope, for any fellow-sufferers. Oh, and I should apologize to Microsoft for all my rants against Internet Explorer. But, then again, probably not ... JL |