 Feedback
from the Race Rocks Advisory Board
My motive for writing a thesis about Race Rocks was to contribute to
the greater dialogue on the role of consensus processes in furthering
nature conservancy in coastal British Columbia.
In the spirit of dialogue, I would like to invite those involved
in the Race Rocks Advisory Board to make corrections, clarifications
and comments on my work. Please send me your comments by email to:
.
I will post them on this page —anonymously if you prefer— and
respond where appropriate.
If there is sufficient demand, I will also create a web page devoted
to comments from other members of the public, including students and
researchers. Send me an email if
you have a comment you would like included in such a page.
Sean LeRoy
November 2002
It has been noted that there is a factual error in Section 6.2.3
(p. 60) of the thesis, which discusses the Terms of Reference
of the Race Rocks Advisory Board. This section states that the Terms
of Reference were endorsed in Meeting No. 3 (26 January 2000)
of the Advisory Board, an assumption based on the minutes from that
meeting. It turns out that this is incorrect. The Terms of Reference
were never fully endorsed or ratified by the Advisory Board, but were
simply dropped from discussion.
Readers should keep this in mind when considering the interpretations,
conclusions and recommendations of the thesis.
March 2003
It has been noted that the numbering of Race Rocks Advisory Board
meetings is not consistent between the thesis and the Race
Rocks Advisory Board web page maintained by Pearson College.
During the preparation of the thesis, I was not aware that the meeting
at Dunsmuir Lodge (22 June 2000) was considered a full meeting,
and did not have access to the meeting minutes (which were posted after
the thesis was complete).
Readers should refer to the dates of a given Advisory Board meeting
when comparing between the thesis and the Pearson College web site.
|
