Four Stupid Arguments For
…and one good one!
The
current Marriage debate has many people worrying about the institution’s
survival. More worrying is what the debate shows about the intelligence of
those involved – most of the arguments stink.
1.
“Tradition - It’s been this way for thousands of years, so why change it now?”
Slavery
was also in vogue for millennia; does that mean it was right? Of course not. So tradition for tradition’s sake isn’t much
of an argument.
2.
Gay marriage will undermine Traditional Marriage
This
argument may well be legitimate, but the next time a divorced politician brings
up this point he should be arrested by the Hypocrisy Police. Will same-sex
marriage ever undermine the institution as much as no-fault divorce already
has?
3.
“The courts are forcing gay marriage on us – MP’s are supposed to write our
laws, not unelected judges!”
True,
judges shouldn’t make law, but that’s not really the issue here. Gay marriage
opponents would be just as unhappy if MP’s, rather than judges, redefined the
institution. So this objection is nothing more than a “Red Herring” – a side
issue brought in to confuse things. Let’s get back to debating the real issue
please!
4. “Most Canadians are against changing Marriage.”
Just because most people think a certain way doesn’t mean
that way is right. As my mother used to say, “If all the
other boys jumped off a bridge, would you too?” Instead of focusing on what’s
popular, we should try and figure out what’s right.
There is really only one good argument for Traditional
Marriage: God created this institution so He gets to decide what it is, and
isn’t.
That argument may not be very appealing to atheists and
agnostics. But alternative is probably even more unappealing because the truth
is if you reject God’s standard for Marriage you’re left with no standard at
all.
ONLY ONE STANDARD
Some find God’s definition of Marriage too intolerant, so
they want to replace it with something a little less discriminatory.
Justice Minister Martin Cauchon
made that point when he argued for gay marriage saying, “There was a time in
But where does this new standard – that discrimination is
always wrong – take us? Yes, gays will be allowed to marry, but this new
standard justifies more than just gay marriage. After all, if two men can
marry, why not three?
A ridiculous thought you say?
Well what about the bisexual? We discriminate against her,
on the basis of her sexual orientation, when we require her to marry only one
gender or the other. How can she live a fulfilled life in such a restricted
setting?
And what of homosexual couples who want to have children?
These couples, by necessity, require a third individual to propagate. For
example, in
Suddenly we’ve entered the realm of polygamy and really, it
only makes sense. If you reject God’s limits to Marriage then there’s really no
reason to have limits at all. After all, if two men can marry, why not three?
Or why not one?
In the
Netherlands Jennifer Hoes decided to end her wait for the perfect man or woman,
and instead married herself. And in
If God’s standard for Marriage is rejected then absolutely
anything is possible.
The
only anchor, the only firm foundation for Marriage is found in God’s design for
the institution. His institution recognizes that men and women need each other,
and that being male and female has real meaning beyond just our body parts. He
knows that children need a mother and a father, parents who are committed to
one another for life, so He hates divorce and adultery.
Over the last 30 years we’ve seen the damage that happens when we deviate from His standard. Instead of deviating further, isn’t it about time we did something to restore this institution to the way God meant it to be? It isn’t enough to be against gay marriage – it’s time we stood up for godly Marriage.