Instructions for Beginning to
Practice Client-Centered Therapy
Barbara Temaner Brodley, Ph.D.
Illinois School of Professional Psychology, Chicago
Client-centered therapy is a therapy based on attitudes. Unlike other therapies its
essence involves the implementation of therapeutic attitudes congruence, unconditional
positive regard and empathic understanding (Rogers 1957; 1959), not the diagnosis of
disorders and subsequent application of treatments. The client-centered therapist's
behavior is guided by a philosophy of persons and by her/him holding the therapeutic
attitudes in relationship with a client; it is not an application of techniques.
Nevertheless, for the very beginner, it is usually helpful in learning the approach to
start behaving like a client-centered therapist before the philosophy and the therapeutic
attitudes have been understood and assimilated well enough to guide the therapist's
practice. Instructions concerning what to try to do and what to try not to do may be
useful in that they help the student to enter into a relationship and to experience and to
observe some of both the client's and the student's actions and reactions. Such
experiences can help the student to understand the client-centered philosophy of persons,
the therapeutic attitudes and some of the benefits to clients in a personal and
experiential way.
It may, however, smack of "applying techniques" to behave like a
client-centered therapist before being guided by the therapeutic attitudes. Thus,
introductory instructions, such as these which follow, risk stimulating misunderstandings
of client-centered work.
These instructions are only an introductory way to experience a client-centered
relationship. Study of and reflection upon client-centered philosophy of persons and the
therapeutic attitudes are essential for developing a true client-centered way of
practicing. This should be kept in mind when employing the instructions because of the
hazard they bring of confusing client-centered work with application of techniques.
These instructions may be validly useful and not be misleading only if they are used
while you are learning about the philosophy, the values and the therapeutic attitudes that
are the essence of client-centered work.
The basic situation for which these instructions are intended is one in which a speaker
(client) is explaining or expressing some personal concern, problem or symptom s/he
currently experiences to a listener (therapist). The listener (therapist)in the situation
attends to the speaker (client) and attempts to understand the speaker from the
perspective of the speaker's internal frame of reference. This intention, to attempt to
understand a speaker from the speaker's perspective, is what is called "empathic
understanding" in client-centered work.
Empathic understanding is fundamentally a subjective experience on the part of the
listener (therapist). It is a subjective and tentative understanding of thoughts and
feelings that are being expressed by a speaker. Empathic understanding can only be
tentative understanding unless or until it is confirmed by a speaker.
The attentive listener (therapist) absorbs the client's communications and personal
expression and, at some point, comes to have a feeling of understanding the client. From
time to time, then, the listener needs to articulate her/his felt understandings to find
out from the speaker whether or not they are accurate according to the speaker. The
speaker is the only possible judge concerning what s/he has been meaning or intending to
express and communicate.
The listener's articulations of felt understandings along with expressive intonations
and gestures are often called "reflections of feeling' or "empathic
understanding responses" in client-centered work. They are usually expressed in the
form of declarative statements. Although empathic responses are usually in the form of
statements, they are always implicit questions addressed to the speaker. They implicitly
ask the speaker "Is this what you have been telling me?", or or "Do I
understand you correctly?".
Empathic responses in client-centered work are almost always expressed with the sole
intention to check or verify the accuracy of the listener's empathic understandings
(Rogers, 1986). They are offered by the therapist to give the client the opportunity to
confirm, reject or qualify them.
The Instructions
Listen to the client. Try to do the following:
- Absorb the meanings the client is expressing to you. Ask yourself to give your full
attention to the client and to what the client is saying to you.
What is the client succeeding in "getting at", or what is the client trying to
"get at"?
- When you express your tentative understanding, think of yourself as trying to check
whether or not you have understood. This tentativeness may be expressed by your
intonation, or you might initiate your empathic response with an introductory statement
that communicates your tentativeness and your interest in the client's assessment of your
accuracy of understanding. Examples of introductory statements are "Is this
right..?", or "Are you saying..?" or "Is this a correct understanding
right now?...." or "I think I understand, is this what you mean?...". You
might use an assertive form of introduction to your empathic response, although it should
be in a tentative spirit, such as "You are feeling...." or "You want
to....." or "You are telling me that...".
- Avoid introductions to your empathic responses which suggest you are trying to interpret
the client or that your task is to find or elicit "deeper" meanings in what the
client is expressing. Introductions which sometimes create such misunderstandings are
"I sense you are feeling...", or "You sound like you.....".
- In your responses that are intended to express the client's point of view, frame of
reference, perspective on things, perceptions, feelings and other reactions about things, stay
entirely within the client's frame of reference. Try to grasp, as you listen, the
client's perspective or viewpoint with the meanings and feelings that are the client's at
that time. Try to absorb those things into yourself in order to reach a feeling of
understanding, without the reservations and interference of skepticism or criticism. Put
aside any doubts or critical feelings about the client's statements and try to
understand the client's point of view and feelings.
- If you don't understand what the client has been expressing to you - perhaps your
thoughts were distracting you, or perhaps the client's communication was eluding you at
the time - simply say you haven't understood yet, and ask the client if s/he would repeat
or say in a different way what s/he was expressing.
- Allow your client to initiate the next response after you make an empathic understanding
response. Allow silence. Relax and give yourself and your client a chance to think and
feel further to reflect upon the experiences that are being expressed between you.
- If your client asks you a question (a) give yourself a chance to absorb the question,
(b) ask for further clarification of the question if you need it, (c) respond to the
question in a direct, person-to-person manner. This means different things, depending upon
the nature of the question, your own knowledge and expertise in regard to different
matters, your own personal feelings about self-disclosure and personal feelings about
expressing opinions. In any case, to respond to a question in a direct, person-to-person
manner means one does not avoid the question or treat the client as the issue for asking a
question. Depending on the factors mentioned above you may literally answer the question,
you may say you "don't know the answer to that question", you may say you don't
feel comfortable trying to answer that type of question, you may say you don't feel
comfortable telling such personal things, or you may say something that is a general
answer to the question but also demur because do not know the general answer applies in
the present situation. After responding in some way directly to the client's question you
may want to check as to the client ' faction or dis-satisfaction with your response. It is
also possible to respond to questions directly and, in addition, express an empathic
response in respect to the feelings, concerns or perspectives that seem to spark the
question. Responding to the feelings behind a question, however, should not be a means of
avoiding the question.
- In setting up a practice client session early on in your learning it may be easier to
ask the client to defer questions until after the practice. This may be best for you
because the process of responding to questions in the context of empathic process, in a
client-centered manner, is very dependent upon having the therapeutic attitudes firmly
developed in your character. And because it is difficult, at an early stage, to respond to
a client's self-exploratory expression and to integrate that with responding to questions.
- Do not ask questions that are leading or probing questions. Examples of typical leading
or probing questions are "How do you feel about that?", "Tell me more
about......", "What do you think s/he would feel about that?", "Can
you tell me more about your relationship to....?". Also, do not ask your client
questions that involve assumptions or theories that are not part of those expressed or
clearly implied in what your client has been saying. Examples of such interpretive probing
questions are "Do you find yourself waking up early and not being able to go back to
sleep?", "Do you remember how you felt about things when your brother was
born?", "How do you feel when someone has authority over you?", etc.
Of course, many empathic understanding responses may be literally in the form of a
question because you are wanting to find out if your subjective empathic understanding is
correct or not. And sometimes you will find you need to ask a question for simple factual
clarification. For example, "Did you say that was your sister or your cousin?"
or "Did you say you got home late or that he got home late?" or "Did you
mean 'now' in the sense of 'these days' or in the sense of 'right now' here with me?"
- Do not volunteer interpretations of any kind.
- Do not volunteer comments upon what the client has expressed.
- Do not make a client's statement into a generality if it is specific and do not make a
client's statement into a specific if it is a generality, unless that is what the client
seems to be intending that you understand.
- Do not abstract feelings or emotions from the content or Situation that the client is
expressing, unless the client's point is the feelings or emotions.
- Do not volunteer suggestions or guidance of any kind.
- If your client indicates s/he feels stopped and doesn't know how to proceed and asks for
your help, a relatively non-directive response that is often helpful is to say something
such as "Sometimes, if one gives oneself a bit more time, some thoughts or direction
will come to mind". Or "I feel there's no hurry, so if you can, try to let
yourself relax to give yourself a chance to see if something comes to you".
- If your client says s/he doesn't have anything more to say about a topic and doesn't
know what to do now, and you have tried the approach above, and the client ask for more
help - then you may suggest s/he give her/himself time to consider if there is some other
topic s/he feels concern or worry about. Or say "Sometimes it helps to think back
over the concerns that brought you in". We do not intend to avoid giving guidance or
help in proceeding in the interaction when the client requests it, but the best guidance
is usually the encouragement to take time and search the client's own experience and
thoughts.
- Unless the client has lost her/his train of thought or forgotten what s/he was saying
and asks for help, do not prompt or remind the client. Scattered thoughts and
discontinuity of theme should be accepted in the same manner as developed and coherent
thought.
- Do not integrate for the client (e.g., "That sounds like it may be related to the
problem you have with your mother"). Client-centered therapy often results in
integrations, but it is not the therapist's responsibility to find or direct such
connections.
- Do not volunteer comments about the client's apparent feelings, state or other
experiences (e.g., "You seem to have a lot of emotions about that topic", or
"It seems you have an issue with abandonment or loss", or "You are feeling
pretty angry at me right now"). Of course, these examples may be the same or similar
to empathic responses, if the client has been expressing any of these ideas.
Self-objectification is one of the productive things clients do in therapy, but the
therapist's task is not to produce that particular relation of the client to
her/himself. Self-objectification is a common reaction on the part of clients if the
therapist volunteers comments about the client's apparent experiences.
- In general, try to orient yourself to the client as a whole person who, like yourself,
lives, acts and reacts in a world centered in her/his own perceptions, motives and
feelings. The client-centered therapist's interest is in the client as a whole
person, not as a complex of problems or symptoms. The client's wholeness is represented by
the client functioning as agent in relationship to the therapist. The client chooses
to enter the situation, comes to the session, talks to the therapist, and represents
her/himself to the therapist. The client is the reason for both of you being there
and the primary source of what happens.
The client-centered therapist's respect for and trust in the client is felt by the
therapist and communicated to the client primarily by means of the therapist's expression
of interest in the client's representations of her/his inner world, inner perspective and
reactions to her/his world.
The client-centered therapist's presence, influenced by her/his philosophy of
persons, values (Bozarth & Brodley, 1986) and the therapeutic attitudes and the
therapist's behavior articulating empathic understandings are the media for communication
of the therapist's empathy, acceptance and congruence in the particular relationship.
The instructions listed above are deliberately and rationally restrictive in keeping
with the fact that the therapeutic attitudes are, usually and typically, communicated
through the checking of felt understandings and the therapist's presence.
There is more freedom for the therapist in client-centered work than these introductory
instructions suggest. Spontaneous responses from the therapist's frame of reference occur
in client-centered practice (Brodley, 1987). In a sample of therapeutic interviews
conducted by Rogers, nine percent (9%) of Rogers' responses were found to be other than
empathic understanding responses (Brodley & Brody, 1990; Brody, 1991).
Functioning consistently as a client-centered therapist, in some interviews Rogers
produced occasional, unsystematic comments, statements of agreement, interpretations or
asked probing questions. When they occur in Rogers' interviews they can be seen to
contribute to the overall sense of Rogers' non-directive and empathic presence in relation
to his clients. Nevertheless, the client-centered therapeutic attitudes are successfully
communicated to clients for the most part by the combination of the expression of
understandings and the omission of many other forms of response (which may,
especially when systematic, convey attitudes which are different from and contradictory to
the client-centered therapeutic attitudes).
As you try to learn the client-centered approach, when you feel constrained or
inhibited by the instructions, it may be helpful to take a break and practice with a
co-counselor, giving yourself permission to "break the rules" and make whatever
responses you feel like making. It may also be helpful to remind yourself that, in
general, in the whole process of ongoing interaction with another person - it is what one
does not think, feel and do along with what one does think, feel and do,
that communicates our attitudes, our intentions and our understandings to the other
person.
Bozarth, J. D. & Brodley, B. T. (1986). The core values of the person-centered
approach. Paper presented at the First Annual Meeting of the Association for the
Development of the Person-Centered Approach (ADPCA), at the University of Chicago,
International House, in September, 1986.
Brodley, B.T. (1987). A client-centered psychotherapy practice. Paper prepared
for the Third International Forum on the Person-Centered Approach, in La Jolla,
California, August 7 to 14, 1987.
Brodley, Barbara T. & Brody, Anne, F. (1990). Understanding client-centered
therapy through interviews conducted by Carl Rogers. Paper prepared for the panel Fifty
Years of Client-Centered Therapy: Recent Research, at the American Psychological
Association Convention in Boston, Massachusetts, August, 1990.
Brody, Anne F. (1991). A study of therapeutic interviews conducted by Carl
Rogers. Clinical Research Paper prepared for partial fulfillment of the Doctor of
Psychology degree at the Illinois School for Professional Psychology, Chicago, Illinois.
Rogers, Carl R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic
personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95-103.
Rogers, Carl R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal
relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology:
A Study of a Science. Vol III. Formulations of the Person in the Social Context. New York:
McGraw Hill.
Rogers, Carl R. (1986). Reflections of feelings. Person-Centered Review, 1,
375-377.
Copyright 1991 Barbara T. Brodley.
Permission granted to distribute freely with copyright intact.
Return to Tools menu