On September 11, 2001, the Pentagon was hit by something at 8:37 a.m. However, the wall was essentially still intact for about 25 minutes after
the hit. The main damage was a relatively neat hole about 16 feet in diameter that pierced three of the Pentagon’s rings at ground level. Where is
the 757 in this picture?
Click photo for an alternate view
No hole anywhere near the size of a 757 is apparent as shown in the representation below.
Computer simulation - Click picture to enlarge
The entire wreckage of a 757 could not possibly be inside the Pentagon. And yet, there is clearly no wreckage on the lawn; no plane wreckage, not
even building wreckage. The mysterious lack of damage at the Pentagon is in stark contrast with the enormous destruction and flying debris at the
WTC south tower.
Click photo to enlarge
The temperature at the WTC was supposedly so high that it caused structural failure resulting in the total collapse of the north and south towers.
However, right in front of the Pentagon sit some aluminum-sided construction trailers, which sustained no apparent damage. How is it that one
airliner loaded with fuel can melt steel and bring down a WTC tower, but the one at the Pentagon couldn’t manage to melt a flimsy aluminum
trailer? Where did the estimated 5-8,000 gallons of jet fuel burn off? Where are the signs of flying building debris? In fact, there couldn’t be
any appreciable building debris because the building is still intact. The bulk of any plane wreckage would have to be outside the building.
However, there isn’t any at all.
Some have suggested that the plane completely disintegrated when it hit the wall. If the plane disintegrated, that simply means the parts were no
longer integrated. It does not mean they disappeared. Surely, there would have to be some debris on the lawn. The entire wreckage of a huge
airliner does not vanish into nothing.
Although the damage below may look dramatic, it’s insignificant compared to the devastation at the WTC and is all building wreckage, not airliner
debris. It might be argued that the plane debris was removed by the time this photo was taken. However, the previous photo shows there wasn’t any
debris to remove in the first place.
The wall did not collapse until 9:08 a.m.
No wreckage in the building, no wreckage on the lawn. Where’s the 757?
Furthermore, how could a fragile aluminum 757 cause the damage shown below:
The walls of the Pentagon are reinforced concrete 18 inches thick. Therefore, each ring having two walls is 36 inches. The projectile pierced an
extremely neat hole through three rings totaling 9 feet of reinforced concrete! We have been led to believe that an aluminum airliner was
solid enough to create a neat hole through 9 feet of reinforced concrete, but at the same time we are told that the entire wreckage completely
vaporized on contact. These two claims are absolutely contradictory. Both cannot be true. Not only would a 757 be incapable of producing such a
hole, we must again ask: What happened to all the fuel? At the World Trade Center, the enormous fire resulting from spilled fuel supposedly caused
both towers to collapse. But at the Pentagon, burning fuel does not seem to have caused any substantial damage.
Furthermore, it's unbelievable that an Al-Qaeda student pilot was able to expertly control a 757 flying at approximately 500 miles per hour so
that it ended up perfectly planted at ground level into the wall of a building only four stories high without leaving even the slightest skid mark
on the grass. That story defies logic and completely ignores the difficulties involved with flying such an aircraft. Frankly, it is ridiculous.
It’s doubtful the most experienced pilot in the world could have done this.
Computer simulation
After 9/11, explanations came out saying that flying a modern airliner is as easy as driving a car. That is nonsense. It may be easy to sit in a
cockpit and turn a little to the left or right, but that’s where the similarities end. Calculating the point of touchdown, figuring in altitude,
airspeed, etc., and accomplishing touchdown successfully is very complicated. It’s for highly-skilled experts. Sure, today, a lot of the
calculations are done by computers, but some terrorist who took a few lessons in a simulator could not know how to complete the task. Airline
pilots are not just glorified automobile drivers or video game players. To imply they are demonstrates gross
ignorance. The Arab student pilot accused of crashing a 757 into the Pentagon was actually refused the rental of a small Cessna a few weeks
earlier because his flying skills were so bad.
Turn up your speakers and watch this (Requires FLASH. High-speed connection recommended):
click here
