|
Freemasonry & Christianity!
Some Christian groups have taken the view that their particular denomination is
the only true church and that all other religions are false, that their church
is the guardian of the morals of the world, and that there is no such thing as
neutrality. They take the position that if you are not within the fold of their
Church you are, by necessity, an opponent to it. The truth about the matter is
that it is these particular Churches that are against Freemasonry while the
Craft always retains a neutral position related to any specific religion.
Freemasonry has no official voice. Its members are free to act and think as they
deem best. If any individual Mason, in the exercise of his right of free speech,
makes any statement against any church it is not the Craft that is speaking. The
Ancient Landmarks, which are the basis and fundamental law of Freemasonry,
clearly and emphatically state that the Craft is not to take part in any
religious or political movement, discussion, or position. Each member must
follow the dictates of his own conscience in these matters.
Some ultra-conservative Protestant devotees of the Holy Bible have taken the
position that any organization that does not include Christ is by necessity
anti-Christian. They urge the point that using the Holy Bible in a lodge and not
recognizing Christ as the one and only God is irreligious; they also claim that
permitting Jews and others to be in the same group while there is prayer and
reverence is sacrilegious. All that can be said of these Christians is that they
have studied the words of Christ and closed their hearts to the spirit of
toleration that pervades the gentle teachings of the Master. That men of every
creed can meet in harmony is the credit of Freemasonry; that these religious
extremists cannot accept the existence of so tolerant a group as the Masons is
to their discredit.
We quote from the speech of M.W. Thomas S. Roy, D.D., now Past Grand Master of
the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts:
"When Freemasonry accepts a Christian, or a Jew, or a
Buddhist, or a Mohammedan, it does not accept him as such, but as a man, worthy
to be received into the Order. We ask him to pledge himself to the highest and
holiest loyalty in his life to be true to his vows. To ask him to vow on a book
in which he did not believe would be the kind of hypocrisy condemned by the
highest teachings of the Christian religion. To say that we reject Christ
because we do not mention him would be a reasonable as to say that we reject the
prophecies of Isaiah because we do not mention them. It is the glory of Masonry
that a man who believes implicitly in the deity of Christ, and a man who says he
cannot go that far, can meet
as brothers in their acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the Supreme Being,
the Maker of Heaven and earth, and in acknowledgement of their duty to love Him
with heart and mind and soul and strength. They can unite in fulfilling the
great purpose of Freemasonry, the development of human character, and the
establishment of the collective life of mankind in brotherhood. In doing this we
dare to hope that we are more than neutral in helping the church in its great
task.
"We are not a religion, and we are not anti-religious. We are a completely
tolerant organization. We stand for the values that are Supreme in the life of
the church, and we are sure that he who is true to the principles he learns in
Freemasonry will be a better Church member because of it. Indeed, just
the other day I heard the Rector of the largest Episcopal Church in another city
say that he was a better Christian and a better Rector because of his
Freemasonry. Freemasonry rightfully conceived and practiced will enhance every
worthy loyalty in man's life. It will not weaken a man's loyalty to his Church,
but will strengthen it by the increased sense of responsibility to God and
dependence on God taught in our ritual. "It will not drain his strength from the
service of the church, but increase his strength for the service of the church.
It will not draw him away from the doctrine of his church, but stimulate his
interest in the values of religion that enrich and ennoble the life of man."
The Reverend J. L. C. Dart, an Episcopal minister, in his article "Christianity
and Freemasonry", printed in 'Theology' (a London magazine), in answer to the
Hannah book said: "At present regular Freemasonry is not a separate religion, or
a schism, withdrawing men from the Church into its organization. So far from
doing that, it exhorts its members to discharge faithfully the duties of the
particular religion to which they belong." And he concludes his article by
saying: "I am a Catholic and a priest. If I believed that Freemasonry
compromised either my allegiance to my Saviour, or my loyalty to His Church, I
would drop it as I would a rattlesnake. But I know that it does not and I know
what I am talking about."
The claim that Freemasonry is anti-religious is always made by those religions
that are totalitarian in character. A religion that is ruled by an autocratic
group, or takes the position that it is the only true religion, or that all
others are wrong, cannot tolerate any group that takes a broad and sympathetic
attitude towards all religions. These groups always take the position that there
is no such thing as neutrality; you are either with us or, by necessity, you are
against us. All reasonable minds will agree that there is such a thing as
neutrality; that failure to agree does not necessarily mean that you are an
opponent.
Much of the trouble in this world results from this autocratic attitude that one
must agree with a certain church or be on the way to perdition.
It is worthy of note that there was no formal church opposition to Freemasonry
prior to 1738. It is possible that this first Papal Bull was the result of a
change in the rules of the Craft. Prior to 1717 the Ancient Charges admonished
Masons to be "loyal to God and Holy Church". The Constitution of the 1717 Grand
Lodge, in the liberal spirit of the age, changed this to read that a Mason be of
that "religion in which all men agree."
Alec Mellor, a French lawyer and devout Roman Catholic who has become a member
of the Craft, has given the matter serious attention and study and has expressed
the opinion that the Encyclical of 1738 was issued because of political reasons.
It is sometimes claimed that Freemasonry encourages religious indifference. How
can this be true when one of the main requirements of membership in a Masonic
lodge is that the members believe in God? Many parts of the ritual teach
reverence to God; the Bible is displayed in every lodge in Christian countries;
and the sacred book of the particular place is an integral part of a lodge in
other countries. On of the things that Freemasonry teaches that its members
should be religious. But in the eyes of some churches this is not enough; in
order to meet the approval of these churches, an organization must go one step
further and must endorse this church and condemn all others. Freemasonry is
determined in its view that its members must believe in God, and it is equally
determined that these same members shall be free to select their own religions.
When these churches say that Masons are left free to attack the church it merely
means that the mere lack of a specific prohibition against opposing this church
must, of necessity, meant that the members will take it for granted that they
can attack the church. Every Mason knows that there is nothing in Freemasonry
that imposes a duty on them to attack any church. To the contrary, every Mason
is taught that while he is free to follow his own religion he must also
respect the religion of other men.
These churches, on the other hand, do not recognize any such thing as religious
tolerance or neutrality; they believe that one who is neutral must be opposed to
the church as a matter of course.
The fact that so many clergymen of different denominations can be Masons and
find no conflict in carrying on their duties is proof enough that Freemasonry is
not a religion. The fact that most Masons belong to some church is additional
proof that Freemasonry is not a religion. And if some men belong to no church
and find enough spiritual strength in the ceremonies and philosophy of the Craft
it is not the fault of Freemasonry. In these cases we should feel proud that the
Craft is able to fill a void in the life of some persons who have been unable to
find spiritual strength elsewhere.
The moral teachings of Freemasonry are in no way opposed to the gentle beliefs
of Christianity. It is not possible to find any lesson taught in the ceremonies
of Freemasonry that can be called anti-Christian.
The basic principles of Freemasonry are the Fatherhood of God and the
Brotherhood of Man. Are these not also the basic principles of Christianity?
Taken from an article written by Alphonse Cerza; 'LET THERE BE LIGHT"
Published by the Masonic Service Association.
See what the Web Master of this site believes.
|