|
| |
| |
| |
![]()
| THE
CANADIAN ART FILM FESTIVAL The art world gathers to look at the big picture this weekend at the Royal Cinema |
|
By SARAH MILROY Friday, February 25, 2005 - Page R6 The work of the artist may be one
of the more delicate subjects to bring to the screen. The history of Hollywood
film is littered with the ungainly residue of those who have rushed in where
angels fear to tread, schmaltz-meisters who see all artists as drunken satyrs
pursued to madness by their demons, riding bareback over the trampled lives of
all those foolish enough to love them. (Last year's biopic Modigliani, starring
Andy Garcia, was a classic example of the genre.) This kind of mythmaking, however,
does a subtle kind of damage. It reiterates the Romantic notion of the artist as
a wild man (or woman), insisting on the artistic calling as a vocation of
passion and self-destruction rather than one of steady inquiry, sensibility and
intellect. I've known a lot of artists in my day, and so far not one of them has
flung me onto a squalid mattress on the studio floor and ravaged me to the
accompaniment of Stravinsky's Rite of Spring. Instead, studio visits yield just
the kind of deliberation and nuanced thought that we discover in the documentary
films screening this weekend in the Canadian Art Film Series, a three-day event
organized by Canadian Art Foundation acting director Ann Webb. Screenings begin
tonight at the Royal Cinema. By and large, these films avoid the histrionics of
the artistic persona in favour of a more sober reality. Anchoring the event is
the work of New York filmmaker Michael Blackwood, who has completed some 40
films on artists over four decades. This weekend in Toronto, he will be
screening films on photographer Gregory Crewdson, German painter Gerhard
Richter, British figurative artist Francis Bacon and -- those darlings of the
moment -- Christo and Jeanne-Claude, the masterminds of The Gates project,
currently unfurled in all its saffron-coloured glory in New York's Central Park. Talk to Blackwood and you'll find
a man who believes that less is more. "I was very influenced by cinéma vérité
in the sixties," he recalls, "and I originally thought that I would be
able to record artists at the moment of breakthrough. I soon realized, though,
that making a film about an artist is not like making a film about capital
punishment, where you can film the prisoner on his last day, or on hearing that
his sentence has been suspended. The moment of breakthrough for the artist is
always very private. It can happen in the middle of the night, or while doing
something totally unrelated." Blackwood soon realized he would have to
experiment with another approach. That other approach was to create
a simple document of the artist in the studio, or in an exhibition, talking
about his or her work -- pure and simple. "I believe in being very direct,
in creating primary source material rather than expressing myself on film,"
Blackwood says. "I'm trying to be as uncreative as possible, in order not
to load another element into the film that it doesn't need." A careful look
at these films reveals masterful editing and pacing, but Blackwood's craft is
unobtrusive, residing in the artful revelation of the telling detail with an
absence of flamboyance. Through the steady gaze of
Blackwood's lens, we learn of Bacon's preoccupation with diseases of the mouth
(a medical textbook was a steady source of inspiration to him), of Richter's
fascination with Warhol's Disaster paintings, and of the fact that Crewdson's
father conducted his psychiatric practice in an office beneath the living-room
floor of the family's Brooklyn home. (Excavation would become a major theme in
his work.) These are the fragments of remembered experience that tell all. Other films in the series involve
more cinematic bells and whistles. Not surprisingly, perhaps, the film Drawing
out the Demons, about Vancouver's Attila Richard Lukacs, is full of filmic sound
and fury, documenting as it does one of the Canadian art world's more genuinely
tortured souls. However, rather than romanticizing the artist's dysfunction, the
filmmaker David Vaisbord allows us to observe the squalor of addiction and the
paranoia and rage that come with it, glorifying instead the artistic discipline
and self knowledge that finally delivered the artist from death's door and back
to the studio. In this, Vaisbord turns the romantic paradigm on its head. Anne-Marie Russell's Worst
Possible Illusion: The Curiosity Cabinet of Vik Muniz also uses some mannered
editing and musical overlay to bring to life the work of an artist whom she sees
as a sort of nomadic trickster. One moment we see him skywriting cloud patterns
high above the desert. Another moment he is painting in chocolate, spaghetti or
white sugar -- all works he then photographs to make his art. True, we get
rather more than is strictly necessary of the charming Brazilian squinting into
the sunlight in his cowboy hat, but the film does convey the artist's
lighthearted and magical way with materials. On Saturday afternoon, in a panel
titled Imaging the Artist, Vancouver artist Myfanwy MacLeod and Toronto's Vera
Frenkel will meet with Blackwood and University of Toronto philosophy professor
Mark Kingwell to chew over the issues raised by these films. Richard Rhodes, the
editor of Canadian Art magazine, will moderate. "Basically," Rhodes
says, "what it comes down to is coming to terms with how we hold the image
of the artist. One of the hallmarks of modernism is that the artist has become a
performer, as opposed to an artisan and a craftsman. In the 20th century, we can
see that every movement in art has come in lock-step with a new style of the
artist-as-performer, whether it's Duchamp's nihilism, Warhol's cool, or Beuys's
mysticism." "In my day," he says,
recalling his art-school years in the seventies, "it was Donald Judd and
Joseph Beuys; they were two very different models of what artists could be, but
they were the ones. In the eighties, it was Julian Schnabel and David Salle. For
all those 20-year-old artists out there now, they have to deal with Jeff Koons,
Damien Hirst and Matthew Barney. It seems to me that it may be a worthwhile
exercise to look carefully at this notion of what an artist is, independent of
the art they make." The weekend-long series begins
tonight at the Royal, 608 College St., with a 7 p.m. screening of two films
about Gerhard Richter and a talk by New York curator and critic Robert Storr.
See http://www.canadianart.ca
for details; call 416-872-1212 for tickets. Saturday's 1 p.m. symposium, Imaging
the Artist, is also at the Royal. |