
|
Karen's Linguistics Issues, February 2002 | This Month's Articles | Previous Months |
Using Self-Assessment in the Classroom: Rationale and Suggested Techniques
1.
Introduction
During
the last 10 years there has been a surge of interest in self-assessment
methodologies in foreign/second language education. Work has been undertaken in many parts of the world and
several reports on the theoretical and practical implications of using
self-assessment techniques have emerged (see Oscarsson 1997).
This
article outlines the rationale for using self-assessment techniques in
language teaching, learning and assessment and presents some practical ideas
that illustrate the many developments taking place.
2.
Why use self-assessment?
According
to Blue (1994), interest in self-assessment developed out of a more general
interest in the area of autonomous learning or learner independence.
However, it has been seen as one of the more problematic areas of
self-directed learning. It is
widely recognized that learners might not have the necessary experience to
make judgements of this sort. Despite
these criticisms, there are a number of reasons why self-assessment should be
encouraged in language classes.
Mats
Oscarsson (1989), a noted scholar in the field of self-assessment, gives six
different reasons why self-assessment can be beneficial to language learning.
First, he stresses that self-assessment promotes learning, plain and
simple. It gives learners
training in evaluation which results in benefits to the learning process.
Secondly, it gives both students and teachers a raised level of
awareness of perceived levels of abilities.
Training in self-assessment, even in its simplest form, like asking
“What have I been learning?” encourages learners to look at course content
in a more discerning way. Thirdly,
it is highly motivating in terms of goal-orientation.
Fourth, through the use of self-assessment methodologies, the range of
assessment techniques is expanded in the classroom.
As a result of using self-assessment, the learner broadens’ his/her
range of experience within the realm of assessment.
Fifth, by practicing self-assessment, the students participate in their
own evaluation (Dickinson 1987). They,
in effect, share the assessment burden with the teacher.
Finally, by successfully involving students in their own assessment,
beneficial post-course effects will ensue.
3.
Self-Assessment Techniques and Procedures
In
spite of the criticisms leveled against self-assessment in terms of validity
and reliability, educators have successfully used the following
self-assessment techniques and procedures in the classroom.
3.1
Student Progress Cards
Oscarsson
(1984) describes student progress cards as simple self-assessment tools which
have been used in a variety of educational settings around the world.
Quite simply, student progress cards define series of short-term
functional goals and group these together in graded blocks at various levels
of difficulty. Both students and
teachers can participate in this activity.
The student can tick off (in the learner column) each language skill or
activity that he/she is sure of performing successfully.
The teacher can later tick off (in the teacher column) the activity
once the learner has mastered it. A
sample activity follows:
Ability
|
Student |
Teacher |
Read and understand texts on a travel theme. |
|
|
Listen and understand passages on a travel theme. |
|
|
Talk about past and future trips or holidays. |
|
|
Write an itinerary for an upcoming vacation. |
|
|
3.2
Rating Scales, Check lists and Questionnaires
A
popular technique in the area of self-assessment has been the use of rating
scales, check lists and questionnaires. These
three techniques have been used as a means where learners could rate their
perceived general language proficiency or ability level.
A lot of developmental work has been done in this area through the use
of “ability statements” such as “I can read and understand newspaper
articles intended for native speakers of the language.”
(Coombe 1992; Oscarsson 1984).
Consider the following listening example taken from Raasch (1979). To complete the activity, the learner indicates his estimated ability to cope with situations by ticking the described level of performance.
|
|
I
understand the language as well as a native speaker. |
5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
I
understand most of what is said in the language even when spoken by
native speakers, but have difficulty in understanding dialects and
slang. It is also difficult
for me to understand speech in unfavorable conditions (i.e. through bad
loudspeakers outdoors etc.) |
4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
I
can follow and understand the essential points concerning everyday and
general things when spoken normally and clearly, but do not understand
native speakers if they speak very quickly or use slang or dialect. |
3 |
| I do not understand the language at all. |
1 |
3.3
Learner Diaries and Dialog Journals
Learner
diaries and dialog journals have been proposed as one way of systematizing
self-assessment for students (Oscarsson 1984; Dickinson 1987).
Learners should be encouraged to write about what they learned, their
perceived level of mastery over the course content, and what they plan to do
with their acquired skills.
3.4
Videotapes
In
today’s technological age, no other audiovisual aid can match the potential
of the video recorder. Video can
be exploited in a number of ways to encourage self-assessment in the
classroom. For example, students
can be videotaped or they can videotape each other and then assess their
language skills. An obvious
advantage to the use of video in self-assessment is that students can assess
not only their communicative or language skills but their paralinguistic (i.e.
body language) skills as well.
4.
Conclusion
To
summarize, there are a number of benefits to using self-assessment in the
classroom. It allows students to
map their knowledge of the language at various points within a course and/or
semester. It also assists
students in the development of critical faculties.
Self-assessment also enables students to look at language in more
concrete terms. Through the use
of the techniques mentioned in this article, self-assessment motivates
students to look at their strengths and weaknesses and become more autonomous
learners which is a fundamental part of the learning process.
Blue, G. (1994). Self-assessment of Foreign Language Skills: Does it Work? CLE Working Papers. N. 3 p. 18-35 (ED 396 569.
Coombe, C. (1992) The Relationship Between Self-assessment Estimates of Functional Literacy Skills and Basic English Skills Test Results in Adult Refugee ESL Learners. Ph.D. Diss. The Ohio State University.
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-Instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
Oscarsson, M. (1984). Self-Assessment of Foreign Language Skills: A Survey of Research and Development Work. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Oscarsson, M. (1997) “Self-Assessment of Foreign and Second Language Proficiency”. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 175-187.
Oscarsson, M. (1998). “Learner Self-Assessment of Language Skills”. IATEFL TEA SIG Newsletter, Nov. 1998.
©Christine
Coombe & Christine Canning 2002. All rights reserved.