The Dirty Dozen

Climbs That Scare Me

    Like many people, I keep some kind of journal of the routes I have done in Squamish and elsewhere. After some time now, the red pen has worked its way through many of the coveted Squamish classics; so much that the gaps are now becoming small and troublesome. There are now quite a few routes that are well within my ability, yet every time I open my guide, these particular three star routes confront me, and I am forced to wonder "why haven't I done that yet?" Because, as we'll soon see, they're fucking 'ard and scary.

Clean Corner (5.8) (Dick Strachan, Dick Willmott '62)

"A fine outing that offers exposed and exciting climbing. Climb the chimney until it narrows to a wide crack. Avoid the crack by delightful stemming across the walls on good holds. An easier chimney above leads to the top."

Kevin McLane, The Climbers Guide To Squamish

The date of the first ascent is what makes me most nervous. Consider for a moment what was going on in 1962. Nobody had heard of The White Album, because the Beatles hadn't even produced Help! yet. The Marlboro Man was cool. Anthony Hopkins was starring in The Elephant Man. In black and white. Climbers were still tying swami belts. What the hell would 5.8 mean?! Desperate thrutching and sparse protection. To confirm this suspicion, one only has to find the right angle by which to study the route. Whilst on The Grand Wall, a full six grades harder than our route in question, I found a fantastic vantage point from which to scope the route. I was slack-jawed and horrified. It appears that getting to the base requires either a long hike and a rap in, or a suspicious traverse over from half-height on Crap Crags. Once at the base, the two pitches above undulate between 4 inch crack and chimney, interspersed with 3 ton chockstones (lodged in securely, no doubt). There are no bolts or any obvious signs of protection. I know of one person who has actually climbed this route. Coincidentally, he appears in Climbing magazine and has put up some of the most spooky and technical alpine climbs on the west coast. His comment on Clean Corner? "The realest 5.8 I've ever climbed."


Neat And Cool (5.10a) (Dave Lane, Perry Beckham '79)

Just look at it! Sure, it's a low ten, but it is steep and committing! Moreover, Perry Beckham is a mullet-wearing hardman (1999 Squamish Guide, pages 266, 381) who is reputed to have regularly climbed to the top of The Split Pillar with friends late in the day, only to commence in drinking heavily at the belay. Once completely destroyed, they would wait until sober enough to finish the route. Back at Neat And Cool, I have long envisioned getting through the first two moves and discovering that I am too pumped to even place any gear. Of course, I would then fall off into the jumbled boulders beneath, splitting open my head.


Bran Flakes (5.10a) (Peter Croft, Tami Knight, Anders Ourom '78)

"A head spinning runout on the first pitch tests your self-worth as a climber."

With this description in mind, I set my tough-guy guns to stun. I set off with much confidence up the relentless slab, reaching a bolt after a mind blowing distance. Clipping happily, I congratulated myself on being true hard man. Who wouldn't sleep with me now? Then, turning my eyes upward, I cast about for the next bolt. I spent some time like that; motionless and scanning. As my eyes strained for the glint of sunlight on steel it occurred to me that I might not be on A Question Of Balance after all. "A head spinning runout" implies a singular, indefinite object, I reasoned. "A runout", not "The runouts". Surely Kevin knew the difference. As these things work out, I was on Bran Flakes, a neighbouring slab route that breathes life anew into the word "runout". There is exactly one bolt located somewhat less than halfway between the ledge and the anchors, 150 feet distant.


Mercy Street (5.10b) (Kirt Sellers, Bill Noble '86)

"Power up the remorseless layback corner…" Kevin McLane, The Climbers Guide To Squamish

This diamond in the rough is found in depths of the South Gully. I have not even come to look at this climb for three reasons. The first is simple; by all accounts, it is a dripping nightmare that only dries out following the most oppressive droughts. Then, once, while on the spacious comfort of Memorial Ledge, I witnessed a full grown fir tree plummet from a cliff like a huge, green, flapping dagger into the South Gully. When it landed at the base of Mercy Street I was supplied with my second reason.
The third reason is more involved. A recent paper in the Canadian Journal Of Mountaineering introduced "Nearest Neighbour Grade Interaction" to the climbing lexicon. Authors Haliday and Resnick have found that when a route is bracketed by other routes of obscenely different grades the middle route is invariably influenced in the direction of the average grade. In general, this means that your first 5.10a gear lead should be in a neighbourhood of 5.6 cracks, not in the middle of a buttress of traditional 5.12's. It forms a corollary then, that at 5.12d, a next-door neighbour The Opal has not yet received a continuous free ascent.


Survival Of The Flatus (5.10b) (Dean Hart, Peter Croft '84)

"A superb pitch with a couple of big runouts." Kevin McLane, The Climbers Guide To Squamish

At the onset, I was not afraid of this route. After all, every second route in England is filled with runout death potential, and that is where I learned to climb. However, the authors of this Lower Malamute work make me suspicious. The aforementioned Bran Flakes is also a Peter Croft creation. In the description of that runout horror-show, McLane only says "a slightly harder and bolder climb," a reference that compares it to the runout classic, Question Of Balance. Two years before rambling up the climb in question, Croft redefined hard free climbing in North America by making the first clean ascent of University Wall. Dean Hart, it turns out, is no slack either. The North Walls of Squamish alone are the forbidding home many of his first ascents. Descriptions of these 5.12 traditional monsters include "strenuous power laybacking," 11b offwidth, "runout on deteriorating rock," and pitches that are "something to really sweat over." This may beg the question: If one were to be "power laybacking" and "redefining" on Saturday, what is the meaning of "runout 5.10" on Sunday?


The Grim Reaper (5.10b) (Gordie Smaill, Neil Bennet '70)

"This famous route, first climbed in stiff soled boots, is one of the great legends of Squamish. Its fearsome reputation for the huge runout on the crux pitch, done on-sight, remains undiminished."

Kevin McLane, The Climbers Guide To Squamish

In 1970, Gordie Smaill must have been living large. I am to understand, from Chic Scott's reading on the "Squamish Hardcore", and sage, oral accounts that he was a hard aid climber, heavy drinker, and generally ahead of his time. At the time of his roller-skated first ascent, most people fell off just doing the easier pitches that led to the crux. It is unfortunate that the thin, smeary nightmare The Climbers Must Be Crazy beat out my naïve enthusiasm for runout slab before I got to The Grim Reaper. Now I will have to climb it while fighting off strong urges to vomit.


The Climbers Must Be Crazy (5.10c) (Nick & Robin Barley '87)

It's on the 5th pitch of the route that this Barley creation earns its name. I headed out from a good stance and weaved up and right over moderate ground. After a disconcerting distance I arrived at a bolt. My heart sank to see that it was of the rust 1/4 inch variety. I clipped it without much hope, and looked ahead to get my bearings. I spotted another rusty number, some thirty feet distant. Gee, I thought. The slab steepened and moderation was replaced with ponderous smearing. I arrived, quaking. This bolt appeared, in quality and size, comparable to something from a childhood tree-fort project. Repeating the ceremony, I saw the next bolt ahead, again, some thirty feet distant. Gee-zus, I thought. Halfway to the rusty offering I froze, struck like I have never been struck before by the madness of my situation. I looked at my feet, pasted onto ethereal depressions that provided just enough friction to hold me in place when properly weighted. I was a foot swap away from looking like a motorcycle crash victim. Every subsequent move was accompanied by dry mouthed anticipation of my bolt snapping demise. There was no trust or hope in my movement as I continued along, making it past two more widely spaced rusty numbers. I arrived at the final headwall to find a streak of water that terminated in the texture between me and the anchors. I studied the blankness ahead, deflated. Then, like a miracle, a low sun came out and poured across the rock. I wobbled up on faint holds, made visible by the heightened relief, and arrived at the anchors, destroyed.


Peanuts (5.10c) (R.Milward, J.Campbell '83)

When I first came to Vancouver, I went to go explore Squamish. Along the way, I stopped at the Comic Rocks. While there, I met a guy who had just fallen off of a route called White Lightning. He looked like he had been dragged through a village by a team of wild horses. I was in awe. He was planning, on this day, to go do Peanuts, which looked hard. Well, if that's what hardmen do, I'm leaving it alone.


Even Steven (5.10c) (John Howe, Dave Lane '86)

Even Steven is located at the suspicious Petrifying Wall; lauded by McLane as "the easiest climb in the area". That Petrifying Wall is a playground for mutants goes unmentioned. Here again, Nearest Neighbour Grade Interactions (Haliday, Resnick) comes into play. All of the surrounding climbs are conservatively protected 5.12 horror shows. No doubt this accounts for the fact that Even Steven is a full on 50 metre pitch of death, punishment, and toil. Who can blame the 5.12 climbers? After all, what 5.10 climber can usurp the difference between 5.4 and 5.6?


Milk Run (5.10c) (Peter Croft, Tami Knight '82)

This entire route is suspiciously hard. Just getting to the base of the real climbing requires a true leading dilemma. Choice one: traverse 15 feet on steep unprotected smears. The belayer has options here too: Giving a lot of slack allows the leader to fall further, but into a grotto of rocks and shrubs. Keeping a tight rope will result in a corner-smacking pendulum. Choice two: the "easier" option heads directly up to a bolt and then requires the most desperate, crimpy, smearing dyno to reach a hand rail where critical failure is protected by falling on your belayer. Once at the first belay, the true punishment begins. A hard, rising, layback traverse is graced with fiddly protection and plenty of pendulum potential. Thankfully, a tough corner pitch ensues with more laybacking. It works out well then that, just when things are looking a bit down, the final pitch turns out to be another full whack of steep, unrelenting lieback. I set about the first ten feet before realizing that I was certain to meet my pumpy death.


Wall Of Attrition (5.10d) (R.Milward, J.Campbell, S.Young, J.Rosholt, P.Ourom '84-96)

McLane's description of this route is innocuous enough, but something is amiss. On the second to last pitch, a blocky, rising traverse, Kevin bothers to script "bold" onto the topo. I have looked through the entire guide trying to find this warning elsewhere, but to no avail. What is the meaning of this! Moreover, a route that rises to the heights of Dance Platform at a grade easier than The Grand Wall should receive frequent ascents. Yet, find me the man or woman that has been BOLD enough to do it.


Frail Scales (5.10d) (Peter Croft, John Howe, '82)

Most of these routes are scary because of what they might do to me. Frail Scales makes the list not for what it might do, but for what it did. Long had I looked at this steep layback, looming over the road on the way to Squamish. It looked ferocious, but great. In a moment of enthusiasm, I found myself working up the steep crimping that leads to a series of flakes. Sharp, but thin, the exfoliations strike up the wall in a draining layback. I gathered my wits and set off with determination. If there was any body shape that I would be given in hell, it would be that of a person with long legs paired with exceedingly short arms. This would make almost any layback a fucking impossibility. Although I don't suffer this form, I did somehow manage to have my feet shoot off of the very first smear and I catapulted off halfway down the crag before coming to the attention of my belayer. Stirred, rather than shaken, I returned to my high mark. I managed to cruise the beginning section, placing friends behind the wafers with little confidence. I came to the end of the flakes and the final mantle. At this point the wall had assumed a slight overhang. Placing a friend, I shook out a pump and sussed out the secret holds that would carry me over the lip and onto the thin shelf above. I committed to an irreversible move and tucked my fingers into the thinnest, shittiest, bottoming crack I've ever been so unlucky to find. I didn't have the juice I needed. Realizing my straits, whinnying and thrutching, I watched hopelessly as my fingers peeled off against my strongest will. Having my gear rip out was just an unfortunate event. It sent me sailing backwards for close to 40 feet. Whoever coined the country wisdom "If you fall off the horse, get right back on" was a fucking moron. I subscribed to this mantra, taking two more 15 foot peelers before running away.


 back