|
Market pays the price for
"irrational exuberance"
Plummeting stock prices create problems for workers, economy
Tom Fuller, AFL Staff
On January 14, 2000, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the
most commonly quoted index of stock market performance, reached its all-time
record high of 11,700. By early October of this year, it had fallen to 7,200, a
drop of 38.5% in a 32 month period. This is not the worst stock market crash in
history – that honour still rests with the collapse of 1929, when the Dow
Jones lost almost 25% of its value in just 2 days.
While many in the media blamed the terrorist attack of
September 11, 2001 for the market downturn, the true picture isn’t that
simple. The index had fallen from its peak a year-and-a-half before the attack
and had been stagnating since the second quarter of 2000. After "9-11"
the Dow Jones fell to 8200, then rebounded back above 10000 in the last quarter
of 2001. Since last January, however, markets have continued to decline. In July
of this year, before the latest slump, the New York Times estimated that
losses to that point had removed about $7 trillion dollars worth of value from
global stock markets.
The basic reason the market has fallen so far, is that it was
grossly overvalued in the first place. Back in December of 1996, when the Dow
Jones was at just 6,000, American Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan warned of
"irrational exuberance" that was driving up stock prices beyond
reasonable levels. Since then, the market has been driven by pure speculation
– people bought stocks not to invest in profitable companies, but to ride a
wave of rising stock prices they assumed would go on forever.
It may well be that equity markets have bottomed out, and
that prices will now begin to recover lost ground. It is unlikely, however, that
we will see the Dow return to its previous high levels any time soon – the
value to support those prices just isn’t there.
What does this mean for the larger economy? Will a depressed
stock market cause the US economy to sink back into negative growth, creating a
"double dip" recession?
Economists have argued for some time that modern capitalism
is more-or-less immune to the kind of scenario that led to the Great Depression
of the 1930s. These days, they contend, the "real economy" is
insulated from the effects of stock market fluctuations. For one thing, modern
corporations don’t rely exclusively on the stock market to raise funds for new
investment. With a highly developed financial industry providing access to debt
financing, companies can expand their operations and create new jobs even when
the stock market is depressed.
But there is another way that stagnant equity markets can
have an impact on the larger economy. The US economy seemed to be enjoying a
modest recovery for the first half of this year. That recovery was based almost
entirely on consumer spending – investment grew hardly at all during the same
period. At the time, some economists worried about the ability of consumers to
remain confident and willing to spend in the face of further bad economic news.
Well, that bad news has arrived, in the form a stock market
crash that wiped out a large chunk of many people’s retirement savings.
Consumer confidence is always a difficult thing to predict,
but people who have just seen a third of their savings evaporate aren’t likely
to plan purchases of consumer durables such as automobiles or household
appliances.
If consumers stop spending, the US economy could rapidly sink
back into recession, one which might well be deeper and longer-lasting than the
relatively mild recession of 2001.
|