----- Original Message -----
From: Kirsten Stevens
To: Merlin Preuss
Cc: Terry Burtch ; Glenn
McKenna ; Roger
Collin ; Roberta
Ellis
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 2:30 PM
Subject: Engine Recovered: TC Docket #AAR2006G097207
Dear Mr. Preuss;
By now I
expect you have heard that the families of Arnie
Feast, Doug and Trevor Decock, Fabian Bedard and Dave Stevens have been successful in recovering
the engine of the accident aircraft C-GAQW (Docket
#AAR2006G097207:
February 28, 2005). Having
delivered the power section and what remains of the blower and accessory
section (recovered July 28, 2005) to the TSB office in Richmond on September 13th,
2007, we trust that:
·
Transport Canada Civil
Aviation representatives of Maintenance and Manufacturing knowledgeable in
DHC-2 aircraft, P&W R-985 engines,
Hamilton Standard propellers and Edo 4580 floats will be assigned to
take part in the investigation;
·
Transport Canada Civil
Aviation Occupational Health and Safety will finally appoint a Minister’s Observer
in respect of the agreement with the Minister of Labour, to ensure that all
safety measures were adhered to in compliance with the Canada Labour Code,
especially Part II:
o "Duties of Employers: Specific Duties"125
(1)
§ "(c) investigate, record and report in the manner and to the authorities
as prescribed all accidents, occupational diseases and other hazardous
occurrences known to the employer;"
§ "(k)
ensure that the vehicles and mobile equipment used by the employees in the
course of their employment meet prescribed standards;"
§ "(o)
comply with prescribed standards
relating to fire safety and emergency measures;"
·
Should it be found that any
party’s negligence contributed to this accident and/or the fatal nature of the
accident, that such party will be held accountable using both TCCA Enforcement
and the involvement of the RCMP further to the Criminal Code of Canada which
states
o
“everyone who undertakes, or
has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is
under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that
person, or any other person, arising from that work or task.”
o Dangerous operation of motor vehicles,
vessels and aircraft: 249. (1) Every one commits an
offence who operates (c) an aircraft in a manner that is dangerous to the
public, having regard to all the circumstances, including the nature and condition of that aircraft or the place or
air space in or through which the aircraft is operated;".
In light of the Canada Labour Code and Criminal Code
of Canada quoted above, we urge you to consider your own statement that it was
“responsibility
of the company to decide when the aircraft is missing and take the appropriate
action”. The following are known facts:
·
My husband Dave Stevens’ body was found and his autopsy
completed on March 7th, 2005 indicating that he had drowned with no
serious injury and despite wearing a Mustang Survival jacket, after
suffering extensively from hypothermia.
This was a survivable accident.
·
According to the initial
report made to the Joint Rescue Co-ordination Centre, a communications search
was initiated at about 11:15 local time (aircraft clock stopped at 10:16),
although MJM Air should have been aware the aircraft was missing shortly after
10:30 when it’s destination called to say it had not arrived.
·
Said communication search
was conducted by telephone only as MJM Air did not have a dispatch radio,
contrary to the industry standard for the area.
·
Shortly after 12:00 noon, a small scale search was initiated
by the Operations Manager when he flew a chartered flight to Johnson Straight
and waited for his passengers to finish in the showers before returning
sometime after SAR had been contacted at about 14:15.
·
Operations Manual 3.4.1
and CARs 723.26 (2) state: "Flight Following for a Type D
system is the monitoring of a flight's progress and the notification of
appropriate air operator and search-and-rescue authorities if the flight is
overdue or missing."
·
Canadian Aviation
Regulations, Part VII, Standard 723.16, (1)(d) states: “Each
aircraft shall be equipped with serviceable and functioning communications
equipment that permits the pilot-in-command to communicate with a ground
radio station for the purpose of flight following with the air operator.
Such a ground station may be operated by the government, the air operator or a
private agency.” There was no ground
radio station for the purpose of flight following.
·
MJM Air Operations Manual Emergency Checklist
states that SAR will be contacted within ONE HOUR of an aircraft being
identified as overdue (missing).
·
A witness heard calls
for help three hours after the accident is known to have occurred.
·
TP14371 Aeronautical
Information Manual, SAR 2.0 Flight Planning, 2.2
Request for Search and Rescue Assistance states: “As soon as information is received that an
aircraft is overdue, operators or owners should immediately alert the nearest
RCC or any ATS unit, giving all known details. The alerting call should not be
delayed until after a small scale private search. Such a delay could deprive
those in need of urgent assistance at a time when it is most needed. “
It is clear that MJM Air was not
operating in accordance with the Regulations or Standards.
At this time, we further wish to
recommend that commercially operated floatplanes (or those being used to
transport workers) have a mandatory requirement for an ELT beacon which works
underwater; passengers on commercially operated floatplanes (or those being
used to transport workers) be required to don their inflatable life jackets
prior to boarding, and that such life jackets be equipped with whistles and dye
markers/streamers or other means of visually aiding location; equipping said life jackets with Personal
Locator Beacons.
We remind
you that an Enforcement Action should already be underway further to the
Aircraft Inspection Report dated 20 December 2006, and would like to be made
aware of the proceedings of this action and if what our rights are with respect
to being an “interested party”.
Having
recently had the opportunity to review the Maintenance Logs for C-GAQW, we have
noted a number of discrepancies with respect to parts and labour which were not noted with the above
mentioned inspection report. We trust
that with the recovery of the power section, these discrepancies will be duly
noted, analyzed and acted upon.
We look
forward to your prompt response.
Stay
Safe,
Kirsten
Stevens
492 South McPhedran Road
Campbell River, BC
CANADA V9W 5K5
Home: (250)287-2725
Website:
www.questforjustice.ca
Petition:
www.petitiononline.com/cgaqw/petition.html
***Note that this email will be
forwarded to the press and Ministers of Parliament and other representatives of
the public