FINAL ASSEMBLY

 

MISCELLANEOUS

 


 

Even with all the previous talk about preparation and painting, it still leaves a question about how much painting to do before assembling the cabin onto the main frame vs. painting after the panels and pieces have been screwed and riveted in place. In general, I'm choosing to do as much painting as practical before the parts are installed as this allows me to easily check the coverage / quality and to get paint on the various faying edges. More importantly, all the aluminum preparation (i.e. alodine and primer) is done while the panels are easily handled as individual pieces. My general idea is to topcoat wherever possible and to leave the exterior of the cabin sheeting in primer till after all riveting has been done. Hopefully, once the entire cabin has been riveted together then I can apply a bit of primer over the rivets and the outside will then require a sanding of all the primer and just the final topcoat(s).

There are a lot of smaller pieces, such as interior panels and the shroud components, whose painting sequence is not really important other than to get all the pieces done before final bolt-on assembly. Where appropriate, I wet-riveted these pieces with primer into larger sub-assemblies before actually painting them. One exception was the side panels that go between the seats and the door sills; these parts were painted before riveting due to potential difficulties getting into the deep recesses with the spray gun.

What happens when I have too much time waiting for other painted parts to dry/cure

Wherever possible, smaller assemblies were pre-riveted together and various holes have already been drilled/cut and verified. I've chosen to paint the inside of the panels in the cabin area with a single coat of white so as to improve the visibility in the area under/behind the seats when performing maintenance. Because this area is "hidden", it allowed me to practice my painting technique. I'm not sure how others have done their assembly sequence, but I thought I'd share my sequence and reasoning.

I chose to try do as much work on the cabin area as possible without the bubble or boom attached. Leaving the bubble off made for very easy access to various areas when doing things such as the wiring. Once the boom is installed it makes it much more difficult to move the craft around and it also makes for a lot of extra walking around or sliding underneath it. There really is no need to attach the boom until work begins on the tail rotor driveshaft. I also kept the ship on the casters as long as possible ... this made it harder to do some of the engine stuff as it was closer to the ground but it also made it much easier to move the ship around and the lower height was very convenient when working on the transmission and fuel tanks.

 

 

At this point, I had to make a decision whether to proceed with the engine installation or the cabin components. Although some of the work is being done in parallel, my emphasis is on the cabin. The reason for this is that the hangar I'm working in is quite dusty due to composites work and I want to get the bubble mounted before doing any of the wiring. I had planned to defer the bubble mounting till very late in the process, but the only thing that becomes really awkward with it installed is mounting the instrument pod. Thus my next priority is to mount the instrument pod and then the bubble. Even before the doors are finalized and hung, I can install the firewall and hang sheets of polyethylene over the door openings to try minimize dust entry.

 

 


 

MISCELLANEOUS

During construction I had been very careful that all the various holes were drilled to exactly the right size; 8-32 screws were a #19 drill, AN3 bolts were 3/16", AN4 bolts were 1/4" drill, etc. For large pieces that are installed with floating nutplates, I made sure that at least one of the nutplates had a precise screw hole such that it would preserve the alignment while the other floating nutplate holes were of the larger variety that allow for some movement of the parts. This philosophy worked well on all the various aluminum panels but it does cause a potential problem on some of the thicker steel parts ... if anything more than the thinnest coat of primer enters the hole, then it needs to be re-drilled after painting for proper screw/bolt clearance. This drilling process can then remove the protective primer and paint and create a place for corrosion to start. While this close tolerance is acceptable for critical holes that align the running gear (especially if Corrosion-X or something similar is used), it can easily be prevented in non-critical areas by just using a slightly large drill before painting. Also note that the more pieces I assemble, the more I feel that critical holes should be under-drilled and then reamed to size.

 

I worked with an AME (Canadian A&P) who always dipped all bolts and nuts in Corrosion-X before installation. His reasoning was that any slight scraping of the cadmium coating is a potential point of corrosion and this would help prevent it. I'm also putting a bit of Corrosion-X on each of the floating nutplates and also into any of the holes that had to be re-drilled after painting.

 

I have found one aspect of standard AN bolts that I really don't like; it would appear that their length specifications are designed for a tension installation of thicker material and not a shear application. Specifically, there are many places where I feel that a bolt one size shorter could be used which can be done with two thin washers or one regular (thick) washer, rather than three thick washers, and still provide the proper threads for a cotter-pinned castle nut. However, if one carefully looks at this they can see that the threaded side of the bolt actually has the taper and/or threads within the material's hole and this allows some extra play, even on 1/8" material. Several dozen bolts that are 1/8" longer than required and each having two extra washers does add up in weight and extra parts. However, with the compromised fit one has to go with the longer bolt.

 

The AN960 washers we use are actually stamped from a piece of sheet metal and have one side with rounded edges and one with square edges and a rougher surface. I'd always thought that if I put the rounded side towards the work piece then I'd prevent scoring the surface or cutting through any coating. I recently read an article that made me realize that while the above may be true, that orientation is backwards of what it really should be. If the squared edge is towards the work piece then the rounded edge is towards the nut and it will allow the nut to rotate smoothly and result in a more consistent and reliable torque setting.

 

The primary fastener nuts supplied in the Safari kit are AN310 castle nuts and AN365 elastic stop nuts. Most locations should be able to use the slightly lighter AN320 shear nuts instead of AN310's if the builder so desired. I've used MS21042 all metal stop nuts in many places ... they're very light and convenient for places like adel clamps. These nuts are extremely effective and it should be noted that they are the predominant nuts used by Robinson. Also, these nuts can be used in higher temperature areas around the engine whereas it is accepted aircraft practice to not use elastic stop nuts forward of the firewall or in any area subjected to heat.

 

After going through all the trouble of trying to get a good paint job, I find it ironic that many people then just tighten screws against the new paint thus gouging the paint and going down to bare metal. The simple solution is to use a thin nylon or fiber washer under the screw head. These are available quite cheaply at most of the large electronics distributors and I've noticed that Aircraft Spruce also carries them as part # 04-00217. I've also found that the nylon washers seem to add a bit to the gripping power of the screw ... I assume this is due to compression of the nylon.

 

One builder was having trouble getting the protective coating off the bubble. Although part of it came off quite cleanly, there was a large amount that only seemed to come off when using his finger nail and wouldn't "peel". After deferring this, the next time he tried removing it, it peeled quite easily. The difference was ambient temperature ... in the 90's for the first try and in the 70's during the second try. I had no problems removing it in mid 70's temperature even though it had been in place for many years.

 


 

<NEXT> Rigging

<BACK> Preparation and Paint

<PAINTING> Novice Painting Thoughts

<HOME>

Last updated: September 18, 2009