SJ23 Tech Tip F09, (Updated 2018-05-20, Bob Schimmel, Art Brown & Bret Hart)
sailors consider this a "go fast" gadget for racing and others consider it
for fast cruising. There is a third category I'd like to call "protection."
A few years ago two of us motored a
C&C 27' in really shitty weather. The weather was just above freezing,
with very steep waves that the old Autohelm 300 could barely deal with. We tightened
the back stay adjuster to save the mast from pumping itself to pieces.
Tightening the rig to save it was a first for me.
So you think you don't need a back stay adjuster because you only cruise your SJ23? Well think again. A forestay that sags when the wind speed increases is bad for windward performance because it makes the shape of the jib too full (draft moves aft). This means greater heeling force and slower boat speed. It's the reason why the jib and main need to be flat in medium to heavier wind. A full sail may also be present in a partly rolled jib when the extra sailcloth in the belly adds draft too far aft. For a roller furler, an excessively sagged (curved) forestay increases the friction, making the sail more difficult to roll up under load. Although prudence would have you release the sheet and halyard a bit to ease the strain of rolling up the jib.
Don't be tempted to tighten the forestay of a mast head rig to solve this problem. The back stay can tighten the forestay with less force due to a more advantageous angle to the mast head (greater mechanical advantage). To avoid straining the rigging and jib, ease the back stay adjuster and the halyard when the wind is light or when the boat is at the mooring. A tightened head stay relates to approximately 1/2 knot of extra upwind speed. Not too shabby!
Shown at right is a factory 2(4:1) back stay adjuster kit that was sold by Clark Boats to those sailors wanting to do some racing. Thanks to Art Brown for preserving this document from the Seattle SJ23 Club. The factory design is quick to set and easy to release. Some SJ23s were equipped with this option at the factory but most were installed afterwards by the owner, including the second chain plate shown in the diagram. The part numbers shown are early 1980s vintage so you will have to update them to today's equivalent parts. Listed below are the parts I used.
for ROLLER FURLING - With
roller furling installed on an SJ23 the length of the forestay is fixed
and its tension is set by the back stay.
All roller furling
manufacturers recommend sailing with a tight forestay as this allows the
foil to rotate more easily, which
particularly important when you need to roll up cloth in a gathering
breeze. They also recommend easing the rig and jib tension
at the dock, to save the gear. The
thread of a standard turnbuckle (factory single back stay) is not designed to be adjusted
It will eventually fail. For these reasons it makes sense to install a back stay adjuster,
provided it is equipped with a safety
SPECIFICATIONS - Pay particular attention to the 1.5" wire block (Harken 304) where the back stay splits. It MUST match or exceed the breaking strength of the 1/8" SS back stay wire. The sheave groove MUST also match the 1/8" 7x19 flexible halyard grade SS wire that Clark's design requires. This block can be opened to replace the wire without lowering the mast. While the Ronstan fiddle blocks will handle just under half the load of the back stay block, they too must match or exceed their load. All wire ends were swaged with a Nicopress copper sleeve and an eye thimble. Never use an aluminum compression sleeve for standing rigging.
NOTE 1 - The flexible halyard wire was cut to length with the turnbuckle set to middle. This allows for slack to release the forestay pin during mast stepping and to take up wire stretch under constant tension.
NOTE 2 - Since the back stay wire block does not swivel, it was
swaged in line
with the split wire to achieve a fair lead over the sheave.
INSTALL SECOND CHAIN PLATE - I've been wanting to do this job for a long time but there is no getting away from it, the starboard chain plate is difficult to install due to the tight space under the cockpit and the cockpit drain tubes that block access. I removed the port cockpit drain tube and still couldn't reach the top of the starboard transom. So I used an offset box end wrench with a dab of butyl rubber on the nut to hold it against the bolt so my buddy could start threading it. By the way I never dropped a nut! I wish it always worked that way. If I couldn't reach the top I was prepared to install a 6" diameter inspection port in the aft end of the cockpit as per Tech Tip D03.
UPDATE SAFETY WIRE and BLOCK & TACKLE - A mandatory safety feature of this design is the 1/8" 7x19 SS safety wire that supports the mast in case the tensioning line releases from the cleat or breaks. You should consider the wire as the primary support and the block and tackle as secondary. Never compromise safety, strength and endurance for a "go fast" gadget.
CAUTION - When releasing the control line DON'T just let it go. This shock unloading, plus forgetting to tie a stopper knot, is a recipe for loosing the mast over the bow. Instead, ease the line out with your hand for a soft landing at the stopper knot.
(INSERT PHOTO OF INSTALLED ADJUSTER HERE)
|Bret Hart's Installation|
|Q - "I do
a little racing now and then and I noticed that I have some head stay sag
that is affecting my upwind performance. I've thought about installing a back stay adjuster and would probably use the
factory design you've posted
here. I wonder how well this would
work with a mast head rig and deck stepped mast. It seems to me it
could put a lot of extra downward force on the deck and compression post
and I wonder if you see it as a potential problem more than a benefit. I
have a friend who has a deck stepped fractional rig and the pull results in bend rather than a downward force. I have seen some
SJ23's with adjustable back stays, in a split configuration, and it didn't
look like the deck was damaged or anything so I wonder what the factory
design looks like. I tend to worry
about the small things too much so maybe it's only a quick answer for you! Your
advice is greatly appreciated." Bret.
A - "If you want to be successful in racing or fast cruising, you must have a back stay tension adjuster. It's one of the best gadgets for pointing upwind as high as possible. For downwind sailing you slack it off and away you go with fuller sails to grab the wind. This adjuster works really well on the SJ7.7 with its fractional rig. To understand this you have to realize the mechanical advantage that makes it possible to bend a fractional rigged mast with less effort. On a mast head rig it is less beneficial, but still useful. I added one to my previous Macgregor Venture 222 with mast head rig and it helped a lot going upwind. I also added a baby stay adjuster that could flatten the mainsail by bending the mast forward. A baby stay can bend a mast very easily so use a stopper knot to limit the pull. Don't overdo it."
If I were to install a back stay adjuster on an SJ23, I'd install the Clark design shown above. An adjuster can increase the loading on the bottom of the mast, as you suggest, but this force is NOTHING compared to the load when the boat is knocked down on her side. Panache is one of the earliest hulls out of the mould and she survived two knock downs in 2000 without damaging the original standing rigging. So don't worry about damaging the deck. The forces are well distributed through the tabernacle and supported by the compression post under it. If you are concerned about the deck see Tech Tip F03." Bob.
Construction - Bret modified the original Clark design somewhat
by installing a Sta-Lok fitting for the block at the bottom of a new 5/32"
back stay. This is the smallest wire size Sta-Lok can fit
to. He ran the free end of the control line to a
cam cleat so it is easy for the helmsman to pull or release the line when heeling. Below are the photos of his installation on Cosmo.
|Fig 1 - The control line lead to the helmsman.
|Fig 2 - Looking aft from the cabin.
I like the different colour line.
Fig 3 - The all important, extremely strong wire turning block held with a Sta-Lok fitting at the bottom of a new 5/32" back stay. The free shackle is probably a good place to clip the end of boom line for mooring storage.
|Fig 4 - The overall view. Very nice
"In the future I will change the purchase ratio from a 3:1 to a 4:1 as shown in this Tech Tip. I can add a lot of tension with the 3:1 but the pull gets pretty hard towards the end. I use 1/4" Yale Warp speed for the running line since it is very strong and low stretch. The safety wire around the blocks will be added shortly as backup." Bret.
Fig 5 - A
variation of the Clark design is to terminate the shortened back stay and
4:1 block and tackle
on the port chain plate. This
eliminates the task of installing a second chain plate on the starboard which
difficult with the cockpit drain lines blocking access under the cockpit.
On the other hand, you could install an inspection port on the starboard
aft end of the
cockpit. See Tech Tip D03.
An access hole that you can also use to
inspect the outboard bracket bolts. "No,
don't store stuff inside here! Geez."
For ultimate strength and peace of mind the split back stay adjuster system that squeezes the two split wires together with a couple of wire blocks is the strongest and most dependable. While there is enough space on the top of the transom to fit a 2" wide pad eye just inside each chain plate, the 2 pad eyes must be reinforced from below to offset a potentially weak fibreglass joint under the black corner moulding. It would be a daunting task to fit an angle reinforcement plate and tighten the nuts from below, considering the tight space. In any case, the squeezer design works best when the 2 split wires are about 300 apart which is impossible to install over the narrow spacing of the SJ23 transom chain plates. To give this design a fighting chance it should have ball bearing blocks to roll along the 2 bottom wires. For these reasons I rejected this system. Just thought you should know.
NOTE - A back stay adjuster is not
cheap since the hardware has to be strong enough to replace the bottom 5'
of the back stay.
Verify the strength of the blocks, etc when you buy. The two
systems discussed here cost about the
same with each
having its pros and cons.
See Tech Tip F10.