
This month
instead of picking a specific group of beers I am just going to list beers that
somehow I never had the chance to over the past little while.
My rating system focuses on how enjoyable the beer is to beer drinkers. The system will read as follows: 5 – Undoubtedly a favourite of many people; 4 – Outstanding, most people will like this beer; 3 – Some people will like this beer some won’t; 2 – I didn’t like this beer, but maybe you will; 1 – I don’t know how anyone could like this beer, but perhaps there is one person. Horsepiss – self-explanatory
Coopers
– Sparkling Ale
(Australia) 5.8%
The nose
has a firm maltiness that reminded me a little of champagne with peaches and
pears. The mouth is lively with lots of yeast and carbonation, but unlike a
Unibroue, the body is very firm. The
fruit flavours are very subtle, but play their role well in the
background. The finish is malty, yeasty
and refreshing. It is a complex ale in
the simplest way. 4/5 (Two thumbs way up as a summer beer!)
Youngs – Special London Ale (England) 6.4%
This is everything I want an English ale to
be! A light amber color, nose of
apples, oranges pekoe and spice. The
mouth has a firm, sweet, chewy malty backbone that starts fruity and finishes
with a moderate bitterness. It is very
complex for an English ale and it is very well balanced between the hops and
the malt giving it a flavour complexity topped by very few other English ales. 4/5
Youngs –
Double Chocolate
Stout (England) 5%
A nice thick light brown head and a
pitch-black color gives off a nose of chocolate and roasted malt. The body is full of rich sweet chocolately
malt which has a dry finish. It is a
nice heavy winter beer (or cold summer day beer), but I found it a little too
one dimensional for my taste. 3½/5
Youngs – Ramrod (England) 5%
This beer says to me ‘Hey if that Special
London Ale was too complex for your simple palate, try this.’ Cause this beer is a mildly bitter, mildly
boring English ale with not a lot of complexity. That said a side-by-side tasting of it and the Special Ale would
be interesting to see how different English ales can be. 2½/5
Huyghe – Campus (Belgium) 7%
Medium Amber color. Icing sugar and oranges dominate the nose
along with hints of yeastiness. The
palate has a malty sweetness combined with an Orange Bitters hoppiness that is
a little off balance and a little too sweet. The finish is dry and orangey, but
very refined. I also found the body had
a little too much alcohol that took away from what could be an outstanding
beer. 3½/5
Huyghe – Campus Gold (Belgium) 6%
This is
their weaker beer (only in Belgium is the weaker beer 6%) out of the two
Campuses. Arguably a Duvel
wannabe. However the differences are
apparent from the beginning with a loose quick dissipating head on top of a
hazy golden colored brew. The nose was
interesting, gooseberries and figs.
While the body was full of rich malt and citrusy hops the finish was dry
and felt incomplete. 3/5
This clear
brownish- orange medium bodied beverage gives off a Cascade hops floral nose
with oranges and apricots being the most prevalent smells. The body is hoppy and chewy while the orange
and apricots are present. I also pick
up background hints of tobacco (not the first Alley Kat brew to have this
trait). The tobacco comes across with a
chewing tobacco likeness to it that accentuates the oranges and apricots. All of this leading into a firm, crisp
moderately bitter finish. I love Pale Ales that actually try to achieve
character instead of trying to be a bland, boring ale with no bitterness at all
in it. This is an excellent North American Pale Ale! 4/5
Big Rock
- Maibock (Calgary) 6.25%
Deep clear golden
color with a rich malty nose giving off just the tiniest effervesces of fruits
(pineapples and apricots??). Rich
medium-full body with typical Big Rock maltiness. The fruitiness becomes clearer here and the palate can find hints
of pineapple and brandy, while the finish is dry and lingering with rich
maltiness. To be honest if I wasn’t
from Calgary I probably would really love this beer, as I might not be familiar
with B.R.’s standard malt/hops profile. But being from here I am just getting a
little sick of the same malt/hop profile and want some zing or zang added to
their beers. 3/5
Side Joke: What is the easier than stealing candy from a baby?? Picking out Big Rock beers at a beer tasting!!
Lacking and
Slacking Styles on retail shelves and a Response to the Parkland Institute
This month
I would like to talk about styles of beer that we are sadly lacking in our fair
city. First and foremost I would like
to start with one of my favourite styles, Stout. Sure, sure, we have stouts in Calgary and even good ones, but I
still have a beef with this style.
First, lets look at the Stouts on hand in the city; we have Big Rock’s
MacNally’s Reserve Stout, which is lackluster out of the bottle, but at the
right pubs, Drum and Monkey comes to mind, can be a damn good beer, but that
doesn’t help when you just want a social on the weekend. Next we have the crowd favourite, Guinness,
and although it isn’t too bad on draught or can, it is just too popular and too
familiar to get an deep sense of appreciation of, plus it is expensive on tap,
especially for the quality. Next we
have Samuel Smith’s Oatmeal Stout, which is truly a wonderful beer, but it is
not a regular, dry stout, not that there is anything wrong with Oatmeal, and it
is bloody expensive, pushing over $6 a bottle in some places. The Double Chocolate Stout from Young’s is
also very nice and I won’t complain, but what I am looking for is a Stout that
I can buy in a six-pack or have on draught, is relatively inexpensive. All brewpubs in the area also make Stouts,
but they do not achieve any real success in my opinion. Even worse, there are no readily available
Imperial Stouts in Calgary. This is one
of my, if not the, favourite style of beer.
The stout issue disappoints me as most cities of our size in North
America have at a least one good local stout available in bottles and draught.
Keeping
with the dark beer theme, I would also complain about a lack of Porters. It seems that in this city if I want a Porter,
I am limited to Samuel Smith’s Tadcaster Porter or Okanagan Spring’s Hotel
Porter. Not that these are bad beers,
but it is the lack of selection that gets me, and the fact that the O.S. Hotel
Porter is actually an Imperial Porter and not a regular porter. That leaves the Tadcaster as the only
available standard Porter. Big Rock
used to make a half decent Cold Cock Porter, but it hasn’t been around for for
a couple of years. What a shame, no
local Porters to speak of!!!
And lastly,
on the beer styles, some styles that are pretty much non-existent in Calgary;
The light and flavourful Saison, the sour and astringent Flander’s Brown Ale, or
the sour, Gueze. Somehow Bock beers
only seem to be seasonal here and not available on a regular basis.
I also
would like to respond to a report by the Parkland Institute called Sobering
Result: The Alberta Liquor Industry 10 years after Privatization. Some of you would have seen this
article in the Calgary Herald along with comparisons of the price of Molson
Canadian and Crown Royal across Canada.
In Alberta, as we all know, prices vary from store to store but are
standardized in many other provinces across Canada. The first thing that bugged
me about the article is the price comparisons, which I thought was part of the
report but after reading the report I found it is not so. In fact it is the Herald who selectively
takes two liquor stores in Calgary and compared their prices for a 12 pack of
Molson Canadian and a 750ml of Crown Royal Whisky to the rest of Canada (though
the Parkland Institute’s report did not mention which liquor stores they used
in the comparison). I am not sure why
this information was selectively used unless to show a biased viewpoint. Once I had a look further at the article
itself I realized they compared several products including (sic) Big Rock. In fact they only compared prices in BC and
Alberta and did not in fact compare across Canada (I was actually shocked by
what I read as the Herald obviously wanted to put a spin on the report that was
much less biased than indicated in the paper).
They found the mean price for their basket of 10 products was a mere $1
difference between Alberta and BC, which is obviously insignificant. Even further, the reported price variance is
greatest in Calgary where there was close to a 20% difference in price between
the cheapest place and most expensive place they took their sample basket from.
Secondly,
the wages issue. Yes, back in the good
old ALCB days (which was before I was 18) clerks got paid $14/hour with
benefits, but I feel that people should get paid what they are worth and being
a clerk at a liquor store does not justify a $14/hour plus benefits job. A liquor store does not need to act as a
welfare program for less skilled people, rather the wages that liquor store
employees get now are relatively low, but justifiably so, in that little skill
or knowledge is required to work in most liquor stores. With more knowledge, more pay seems
appropriate. But I don’t think there is
any need for the liquor store industry to be promoted as a good career path
based solely on wages alone (this is not to slight anyone in the industry, but
is a generalizing comment about public organizations and the relatively decent
wages for low skilled jobs). Of course many
people who do choose this as a career path do so out of interest in the
industry and not solely based on the wages.
A decrease in wages I see as a much more positive, than a negative, thing
though I am sure several readers will have opposing views.
Thirdly,
the proliferation of liquor stores.
Yes, I agree that it has got out of hand how many liquor stores there
are in this city. I have never been to
any other city in the world where it is easier to find a liquor store. I can
count five liquor stores within a 10-minute walk from my house. Two of them I have never been to and
probably never will. On this issue I
think the government could have had limits on the number of liquor stores opening
up each year to control the excess amount.
Lastly the
Parkland Institute argues that prices will increase, while revenue won’t and
that it will become an oligopolistic market with large retail chains
prevailing. I say if that is true then
great!! I don’t necessarily see this as a bad thing as it could possibly lead
to lower prices and more specialization.
What it does mean however is the average liquor store without a good
business plan is going to fall by the wayside and Darwin’s theory will
prevail. In conjunction with this point
I would like to say that we don’t need a centralized wholesale warehouse, which
is still run by the ALCB and they of course will want to hold on to this cash
cow. However, I think liquor stores or other licensed establishments should
have the flexibility to act as agents to bring in whatever products they want
at whatever price. This will lead to
each store defining their market as they will have to compete in either the
specialty market or the low cost market.