How To Use This Guide
Table of Contents
Fallacies of Distraction
-
False Dilemma: two choices are given when in fact
there are three options
-
From Ignorance: because something is not known to be
true, it is assumed to be false
-
Slippery Slope: a series of increasingly
unacceptable consequences is drawn
-
Complex Question: two unrelated points are conjoined
as a single proposition
-
Attacking the Person:
- the person's character is attacked
- the person's circumstances are noted
- the person does not practise what is preached
-
Appeal to Authority:
- the authority is not an expert in the field
- experts in the field disagree
- the authority was joking, drunk, or in some
other way not being serious
-
Anonymous Authority: the authority in question is
not named
-
Style Over Substance: the manner in which an
argument (or arguer) is presented is felt to affect the
truth of the conclusion
-
Hasty Generalization: the sample is too small to
support an inductive generalization about a population
-
Unrepresentative Sample: the sample is
unrepresentative of the sample as a whole
-
False Analogy: the two objects or events being
compared are relevantly dissimilar
-
Slothful Induction: the conclusion of a strong
inductive argument is denied despite the evidence to the
contrary
-
Fallacy of Exclusion: evidence which would change
the outcome of an inductive argument is excluded from
consideration
-
Accident: a generalization is applied when
circumstances suggest that there should be an exception
-
Converse Accident : an exception is applied in
circumstances where a generalization should apply
-
Post Hoc: because one thing follows another, it is
held to cause the other
-
Joint effect: one thing is held to cause another
when in fact they are both the joint effects of an
underlying cause
-
Insignificant: one thing is held to cause another,
and it does, but it is insignificant compared to other
causes of the effect
-
Wrong Direction: the direction between cause and
effect is reversed
-
Complex Cause: the cause identified is only a part
of the entire cause of the effect
-
Begging the Question: the truth of the conclusion is
assumed by the premises
-
Irrelevant Conclusion: an argument in defense of one
conclusion instead proves a different conclusion
-
Straw Man: the author attacks an argument different
from (and weaker than) the opposition's best argument
-
Equivocation: the same term is used with two
different meanings
-
Amphiboly: the structure of a sentence allows two
different interpretations
-
Accent: the emphasis on a word or phrase suggests a
meaning contrary to what the sentence actually says
-
Composition: because the attributes of the parts of
a whole have a certain property, it is argued that the
whole has that property
-
Division: because the whole has a certain property,
it is argued that the parts have that property
-
Subverted Support (The phenomenon being explained
doesn't exist)
-
Non-support (Evidence for the phenomenon being
explained is biased)
-
Untestability (The theory which explains cannot be
tested)
-
Limited Scope (The theory which explains can only
explain one thing)
-
Limited Depth (The theory which explains does not
appeal to underlying causes)
-
Too Broad (The definition includes items which
should not be included)
-
Too Narrow (The definition does not include all the
items which should be included)
-
Failure to Elucidate (The definition is more
difficult to understand than the word or concept being
defined)
-
Circular Definition (The definition includes the
term being defined as a part of the definition)
-
Conflicting Conditions (The definition is
self-contradictory)
|