Satan's Pawn - Daniel Chew Huicong (unsaved)

Sex: Male
Year of Birth: 1982
Religion: Calvinism Heresy (killer of the image of God) and Denies Original Sin
Ethnicity: Chinese
Nationality: Singaporean
See also "The Tares" - the mental breakdown of Daniel Chew Huicong

The contradiction and evil: Daniel writes (Jan. and Feb. 2008), "To the question of whether God desires the repentance and salvation of all Man, we can therefore answer that God commands the repentance of all Man, but doesn't exactly desire it (as loaded with the modern connotation and theological usage of the Neo-Amyraldians). And for this position, we have the support of almost all the Reformed giants [essential Calvinism] on our side. How should we preach the Gospel? We should not preach the Gospel like the [OSAS] Arminians...that God desires everybody to be saved. The focus should be on their need to [assume irresistible] repent[ance] rather than God's desire to save." What horrible teachings! In other words, the god that Daniel worships can't compare to God of the Bible because his god is either unwilling or unable to provide everyone sufficient grace to have the choice and actually desires to send people to hell who were born sinners not of their own doing, making his god the bright and fallen angel Lucifer who condemns unjustly. Daniel Chew Huicong is non-other than Satan's pawn who will help usher in the Antichrist through Calvinism (the deceit has to be enticing to the flesh for it to be credulous). I pray the reader see the evil in commanding repentance when one is unable to repent in Calvinism for they are according to them Totally depraved. This is a mocking, incredulous and repugnant god-the god of Calvinism. If a Calvinist is saved you don't want to be, because the salvation would be from an evil, gnostic creator. Be careful! The deception at the consummation of this age will be convincing. This heresy which was never accepted by the body of Christ. The false teaching fulfills a basic old saying "you get to have your cake and eat it too" or you have heard the phrase, "the deck is stacked." TULIP stems from a man who is unwilling to repent and believe in Christ to be regenerated and so, turns his back to God for Satan's counterfeit by presuming regeneration was irresistibly given to him without the choice. Such an attitude only engenders self-worship and pride over others who were denied sufficient grace to even have the opportunity to be saved. What love is this? Calvinists who later became born-again testified they did so by having repented of Calvinism and came to God with a sincere and honest heart, believing in the Christ they had never known before. God's grace came upon them to show them the light of the true gospel of salvation in Jesus Christ. Amen.

Arminius himself said, It is not that he believed one could lose eternal life, but that it seemed like some verses could be read that way if one was not careful. Such verses point to loss of rewards not loss of life.

God's Spirit first breathed into man's body to create the soul life. Then man falls and needs salvation. John 3.16,18 says we may be saved ("whosoever believeth") if we believe in Jesus. Thus, God predestinated us by foreknowing our free-choice (Rom. 8.29). Since God has infinite foreknowledge, He can foresee whether we will come to the cross or not. God need not be debased into being unable to predestinate by foreknowledge for that would be a lesser god of calvinism who would require the person be preprogrammed to choose.

The 4 points of osas arminian are: (1) ability or choice made in God's image to receive the cross by being drawn by God; (2) election is conditional based on the choice we make in God's image; (3) atonement is for the sins of the whole world, it is unlimited because God is unlimited; (4) if we choose to resist God's grace we can do so for God does not make automatons; and (5) God preserves the saints forever because He has the foreknowledge whom to give His life to. An authentic choice for Christ can never be lost, for it is a choice for forever.

Gnosticism is "the world and our bodies were created by an incompetent lesser God, but we contain a spark of divinity, and Jesus provided us with the knowledge to free it". This does not agree with, "for the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and spirit, of joints and marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart" (Heb. 4.12). Gnosticism is saying we were created by an incompetent lesser God. The fact that we have a spirit, soul and body is not gnosticism, but the very Word of God explaining our being. "May the God of peace himself sanctify you wholly; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Heb. 4.12). It is not true at all that soul is sinful and the spirit not. This is a misrepresentation of our soul and spirit by Daniel. In an unsaved person, the spirit is no less unsaved than the soul. This shows Daniel does not understand we have a spirit, soul and body and what these parts of our being are.

Do you find it hypocritical when Daniel says he does not accuse someone of unsalvation when he accused them of having an "unregenerate mind"? An unregenerated mind is an unsaved one. Also, do you have fear of going to hell if you are saved? Daniel says a person can go to hell if they are saved, that is, they can lose salvation. This is a false teaching.

Notice his sinful accusation, "taking the Lord's name in vain." Where did I do that? I am not pelagian, but a Christian (osas arminian). I do not deny the original sin. And I am not a gnostic, since I do not believe that I was created by a lesser god. I was created by God of the Bible. But, Daniel Chew does believe in a lesser god, because he believes God does not have the infinite foreknowledge in Rom. 8.29 to foresee our choice of whether we come to the cross or not. In calvinism, his lesser god can only premake robots.

In the fallen nature, the spirit is just as sinful as the soul, but the pawn of Satan accuses falsely, "he splits the soul and the spirit to the extant that the soul is sinful but the spirit is not." I do not do this, since the spirit is just as fallen as the soul in the unsaved.

God says He will save those who receive His Son, which means not all sinners deserve hell; some sinners will be saved.

God died on the cross for the sins of the whole world and all people. Not all people are saved because not all people receive the cross. One calvinist writes, "You cannot consistently say that God foreknew who would be saved and then preach that God is trying to save every man." The cross covers all sin and all men though not all men accept salvation: resisting God's grace.

Satan's Pawn: I appreciate your feedback. However, it seems to me that you are very confused over this issue. I would assume that no one has ever pointed out the truth to you.

Let me first start off by stating that your letter to me, together with what you have put on your website, shows your ignorance of what Calvinism and Arminianism really is. I really do not appreciate your strawman caricature of my position, and that of the historical Christian faith. Thus said, I would assume that do not know otherwise and would be receptive to correction regarding your presentation of my position.

From your feedback, I can see that you perhaps are primarily objecting to my article on the difference between the Arminian doctrine of Once saved, always saved and the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints. If you would just read it properly, you would see that my primary target in this article are the 4 point Arminians like that of Dave Hunt or Norman Geisler, and other like them in the Southern Baptist Convention who believe in easy-believism. In fact, the fact that such carnal "Christians" exist gives a sort of legitimacy of ministries like Dan Corner of Evangelical Outreach ministries who are full blown Arminians.

That said, I would like to show you a presentation of the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. You can see for yourself that Calvinism does not equate to or imply 'roboticism'. God gave us free will, but our wills are kept in bondage and slavery to sin, thus we can't choose God unless God chose us first and regenerates us by the Holy Spirit. God did not choose some innocent people to go to heaven and others to go to hell, but God choose sinners who are ALREADY condemned to hell and saved them so that they can go to heaven.

You have been trying to rationalize calvinism and monergism (there is no way to rationalize it).

Satan's Pawn: f you believe in OSAS as an Arminian, can you please tell me why is it that a person who is justified must be sanctified? Why can't the person choose NOT to be sanctified? After all, he has free will , doesn't he? Also, what is your basis for believing that a person once saved remains saved (OSAS), since the person can still choose by his own free will to reject Christ after his salvation?

Know that Arminians do not have libertarian free-will, but calvinists do, for calvinist declare by their own free-will they are premade for salvation like robots.

Satan's Pawn: The definition of livertarian free will is that a person has the free will to choose anything and everything, even those things that are contrary to his nature. Arminians DO believe in libertarian free will since they believe that they can choose God even though they are sinful in nature, whereas we Christians deny libertarian free will since we believe that we are slaves to sin (Jn. 8:34) and unable to choose God unless God chooses us first.Calvinists DO NOT declare by their own free will that we are 'premade for salvation like robots'. We are not made for salvation, we are chosen. All of us are born ('made') depraved and sinful. Only God is the one who chooses some of us sinners and save us, all because of his glorious grace.(Eph. 1:4-6).

That lie is the lie in the pride of your thinking you are premade for salvation like a robot.

Satan's Pawn: A total strawman. Read my article on soteriology and then try again. We were not premade for heaven, we were chosen to be saved by God and are saved while we were on the road to hell. From the article that you have written and referenced, I can see that you deny the doctrine of total depravity. Perhaps you might want to consider the Bible's teachings on the depravity of Man in Ps. 14:2-3 and Rom. 3:10-18, which states explicitly that Man does not seek after God on his own.

These verses speak of propensity to sin, not total depravity. A Christian (osas arminian) may lose rewards of the kingdom for not letting God work a complete work in the believer unto overcoming. God deals with this lack through loss of rewards in outer darkness, outside the light of rewards of reigning with Christ for the 1000 years.

Satan's Pawn: You are assuming dispensationalism, and a particlar brand of that also, here.

Christians believe in justification by faith as well as sanctification by faith. We are sanctified (cleansed) through faith in Christ bringing in God's grace. Both sanctification and justification are not divorced.

Satan's Pawn: When I mean that a modern-day Arminian like Dave Hunt divorces justification from sanctification, I DO NOT mean that they are not both by faith. What I meant is that in such a view, a person can be justified but may not undergo the process of sanctification. In other words, sanctification is optional in the life of a Christian, though he/she may lose many rewards because of this, as per what you have said in the passage preceeding this.

I, and all other Calvinists, are saved through our belief and acceptance of the atoning blood of Jesus Christ which He shed on the Cross for all believers. I honestly do not know what 'other way' you are talking about. I have stated in my OSAS article that we Calvinists do not divorce justification from sanctification, thus we believe that all who are saved will grow in holiness in Christ, otherwise we do not regard them as being saved at all (1 Jn. 2:19). In fact, your argument of knowing by false fruit is the argument made by Dan Corner, who uses that to argue against OSAS and say that it is a damnable doctrine that brings people to hell.

This is a strawman!!. Show me one Calvinist which believes in this type of trash and I will show you an unbeliever. We are saved when we believe in Christ, not by 'premaking like robots'. However, this is accomplished by God the Father choosing us believers before the foundation of the world, the Son atoning for us believers, and the Holy Spirit regenerating us (born-again) so that we have faith to choose Christ.

Perhaps you can learn how to use the phrase libertarian free will properly, now that you are informed of its correct definition?

You may claim you were made this way as a result of your calvinism regeneration, but this more likely is just your unsalvation: a false salvation of the tares who try to look like the wheat. There is no such recourse under calvinism, and thus what happens is you lower your conscience and presume you are abiding, when in fact you are not, but getting further and farther into deception, because there is no consequences.

Satan's Pawn: Besides the fact that all these phrases commit the ad-hominen fallacy, I do not think that you have the right to question my motives - to say that I am covering up the truth which I 'actually believe in' (according to you). I think also that you are being judgmental when you declare me an unbeliever without valid proof, and furthermore, by invoking the Holy Spirit and saying that He has revealed it to you is firstly, blasphemy, since it is false. Secondly, it is a denial of Sola Scriptura or Scripture alone for you to claim extrabiblical revelation. Foreknew is NOT equal to foreknowledge, if you read the Greek. Also, from your articles, I see that you make the error of assuming that responsibility implies ability, which is ridiculous since God does demands things of us which we can't do - i.e. God demands that we are holy but we can never be holy.)

It is my wish that you sincerely give heed to what I have said and at least stop misrepresenting us. If you want to refute what I have written, the very least you could do is to represent Calvinism properly, and also take care of your logical (nevemind biblical) inconsistency when Dan Corner and co. come knocking at your back door for your embrace of the doctrine of eterny security.

The 4 points of calvinism are easy believism, for you delude yourself that you are premade for salvation like a robot not requiring true repentance to come to the cross. How easier could it be! We are not totally deprave because if it was so, we would not be made in God's image with a right to come to the cross to receive God's saving grace. Romans 8.29 says, God predestinates by foreknowledge: "For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate". The books are opened. Some are blotted out who were in those books. It is because the choice is made to refuse God's grace, not because they were premade that way to go to hell. We do not choose Christ by the fallen will, but by the will made in God's image.

Libertarian free will at work in calvinism, for the calvinist demands being premade for salvation like robots. How much more libertarian can you get than that in practice? OSAS arminians do not believe in libertarian free-will, but that we are made in God's image to have the choice.

When you say you were chosen to be saved by God before you could believe this is what is meant by being premade for salvation like a robot. God does not save first, for He saves after the man believes: conditional election and resistible grace. Election is conditional upon employing the image of God in which man is made in.

Understand how you confuse the fallen nature with total depravity. Total depravity says man can't choose because the image of God has been killed. Fallen nature says the man is corrupted by sin, but is still made in God's image. Through that image, man can come to the cross and be drawn by God to receive God's saving grace. Man's flesh does not seek God, but man's will made in God's image yet can come to the cross.

If you read the Greek you would realize foreknowledge is always foreknowledge. You have no faith to believe in God's infinite foreknowledge because you believe in a lesser god. That's what it come down to. You have no faith to believe that God can foresee billions of years into the future.

Satan's Pawn: I am very disappointed in your response. It seens that you are so arrogant to think you can define my position for me. Can you interact with my position instead of all your ridiculous strawmen? I will only responsd to your attempted refutation, and ignore all your blatent ad hominem slurs and insults you have piled on me, which if you have noticed, I did not do likewise to you as I tried to think the best of you.

So are you accusing the Bible of teaching falsehood? I would really want to see you exegete Ps. 14:2-3 and Rom. 3:10-18, if you can. The Imago Dei does not in any way refer to Man being able to seek God. And what right do you think we have to come to the cross? Didn't God say that it is by grace we have been saved, and not by ourselves (Eph. 2:8-9) ? Since when was the priveledge of coming to Christ a right you can demand of God? Does God owe you your salvation?

Romans 8.29 says, God predestinates by foreknowledge: "For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate". Some are blotted out who were first in those books. It is because the choice is made to refuse God's grace.

Satan's Pawn: So how can you believe in OSAS when you say that some people who were intially in have their names blotted out? By your admission, you are denying OSAS. That man has not saving grace of himself, nor of the energy of his free will, inasmuch as he, in the state of apostasy and sin, can of an by himself neither think, will, nor do any thing that is truly good (such as saving Faith eminently is); ... (Article 3, The Remonstrant articles)

That this grace of God is the beginning, continuance, and accomplishment of all good, even to this extent, that the regenerate man himself, without prevenient or assisting, awakening, following and cooperative grace, can neither think, will, nor do good, nor withstand any temptations to evil. ... (Article 4, The Remonstrant articles)

The Canons of the Council of Orange (529AD) CANON 1. If anyone denies that it is the whole man, that is, both body and soul, that was "changed for the worse" through the offense of Adam's sin, but believes that the freedom of the soul remains unimpaired and that only the body is subject to corruption, he is deceived by the error of Pelagius and contradicts the scripture which says, "The soul that sins shall die" (Ezek. 18:20); and, "Do you not know that if you yield yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are the slaves of the one whom you obey?" (Rom. 6:16); and, "For whatever overcomes a man, to that he is enslaved" (2 Pet. 2:19).

CANON 2. If anyone asserts that Adam's sin affected him alone and not his descendants also, or at least if he declares that it is only the death of the body which is the punishment for sin, and not also that sin, which is the death of the soul, passed through one man to the whole human race , he does injustice to God and contradicts the Apostle, who says, "Therefore as sin came into the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all men sinned" (Rom. 5:12).

CANON 4. If anyone maintains that God awaits our will to be cleansed from sin, but does not confess that even our will to be cleansed comes to us through the infusion and working of the Holy Spirit, he resists the Holy Spirit himself who says through Solomon, "The will is prepared by the Lord" (Prov. 8:35, LXX), and the salutary word of the Apostle, "For God is at work in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure" (Phil. 2:13).

So your denial of original sin shows that you are NOT even an Arminian, regardless of what you say.

Our being cleansed before God, is our sanctification by faith. If anything is lacking in a believer, it is consecration, setting himself apart for God, which not all Christians do, so not all believers will receive rewards.

Satan's Pawn: This is the Gospel of Jesus Christ that saves Man; that we are created by God (Gen. 1:27), that we fell in Adam and became sinful (Gen. 3:1-19), that all of us have sinned and fall short of God's glory (Rom. 3:23) and that we are thus subject to the wrath of God (Rom. 1:18), and our depravity is such that our inclination of our hearts is towards wickedness (Gen. 6:5; Rom. 3:10-18) and that we can not chose God on our own (Ps. 14:2-3, Rom. 3:11). However, Jesus Christ came down to die on the cross so that all who believe in him will not perish but have eternal life (Jn. 3:16), such that we are to repent of our sins (Acts 2:38-39; Acts 17:30) and believe and accept Jesus Christ as our Savior and Lord, thus following Christ and denying ourselves daily (Mt. 16:24-26; Lk. 9:22-24).

The key word is "inclination," not total inability; propensity to sin, not total depravity. It's interesting that a calvinist can use similar words, but still be unsaved.

Satan's Pawn: by the way, I see how you have misrepresented Matt Slick as well. Oh well, is there any Calvinist in which you do not misrepresent? Why don't you try to take on Dr. James R. White, Dr John MacAthur, Dr. John Piper or even Elder Philip R. Johnson? May God grant you repentance to eternal life.

I believe each of these men you cite are unsaved. Whereas I believe Dave Hunt and Watchman Nee were spiritual Christians.

Psalms 14.2-3 speaks of the flesh which can not receive God. This is why we need the work of the Holy Spirit to convince and change men, but this does not mean that God gives new birth before repentance. God works righteously in all that He does to affect a change in men, which commenced with creating man in His image to have a right to choose the cross through repentance and by faith.

Don't believe this prideful preselectionism. This does not glorify God. It never will, for God wants to walk with those in His image who come to the cross as helpless sinners to receive Jesus as Lord and Savior. Just because we are fallen, does not mean we are zombies.

Enough answering the fool indeed (Prov. 26.4), "I have not sat with vain persons, neither will I go in with dissemblers" (KVJ) and "I do not spend time with liars or go along with hypocrites" (NLT).

You can see how deluded and darkened is the mind of Satan's Pawn ("tares" Matthew 13, trying to look like the wheat): Daniel Chew Huicong.