Sean Heath (leeist)

Sean writes on Wednesday, February 23, 2005, "One more thing....lee does believe that God is triune so where do you get your info that he is a modalist?"

I am aware Witness Lee did not believe in the Godhead: The Trinity, the Triune God of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Spirit. In God's Word it is not possible to have God's Trinity and modalism at the same time for they are polar opposites. Doublespeak in claiming both is incompatible.

The place I get the proof that Witness Lee is a modalist is in a quote where Witness Lee said "God is a threefold Person" or "the Father is the Son". God is not a Person who is 3 Persons. God is not 3 Persons who is a Person. God is 3 Persons, Period! The Bible never confuses the Father for the Son or the Son for the Father.

It also needs to be pointed out that false locality with a central hub of same false teachings and no independency of localities is another sign of Witness Lee's unregeneration when he created the lsm/lc denomination for the profits of filthy lucre product sales and mind-control through various methods such as violent screaming sessions and altering Watchman Nee's writings (by emphasizing hate) saying they were his when they were not.

Sean also teaches passivity, "you know nothing as you ought, not you know nothing. I also know nothing as I ought. That is all I was saying because you talk like you know something." This is actually a double negative for proper English is - you do not know what you ought when you claim you know everything. We should not believe we know everything, nor should we believe we ought to know nothing. A leeist will relish in legalisms and doublespeak to attempt to gain opinion, power and glory for themselves. According to Sean, though one may not "know nothing", you ought to know nothing which is passivity and not God's will.

Also, if a person does not know anything, he would be a vegetable. God gives His Word so we can know things. It is a great mistake to focus on a verse and not see the Scriptures in total; that is called legalism. If someone speaks as though they know something, they very well may know what they are speaking of so please refuse in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit ideas that somehow knowing something that is true (either soulical or spiritual knowledge) should be accused of and dismissed (e.g. such as "you talk like you know something") by legalizing and altering the meaning of 1 Cor. 8.2. 

In speaking of knowledge and eating foods prepared for idols, 1 Cor. 8.2 reads, "Anyone who claims to know all the answers doesn't really know very much," but "if any man love God, the same is known of him" (v.3).

A good chapter to help Sean in his passivity is The Believer's Mistakes in The Spiritual Man (CFP).

Troy Brooks