If I have made any mistake, please correct me here. I did a search at CF on Oct. 6, 2006 for "futurist" or "premillennial" + "Christian" + "Gap," and there were only three accounts that were active in the last 6 months out of 165,024 accounts. Please do not tell me there is not an active effort at this Roman Church forum to eradicate these Christians. Trying to find these Christians at CF is like looking for a needle in a haystack because Satan has been blocking the coming together of correct teaching. And the person directly responsible for this blocking is Erwin Loh doing Satan's bidding. You can check in the future if improvement has been made under the new ownership. I have no interest in such a place.

What do you think we can do about this problem?

In reading Revelation 17, one realizes we can't do anything about their system because only Christ has that power to destroy it when He returns. To look for believers there is futile. One does not find peace by immersing themselves in a boiling pot.

One way to get to the bottom of Erwin's beliefs is to observe is actions. The majority of administrators are Roman Catholic. If the majority is Roman Catholic, then the majority would be into amillennialism and non-OSAS. But God's way of salvation is OSAS, and premillennial is the correct end-time view (known as chiliasm in the first century).

The Bible says not to say "I of Cephas" (denominational) nor "I of Christ" (non-denominational). Erwin says he is "non-denominational" Why are the "Messianic Jews" denomination the second largest administrator group? Does it have something to do with Ryan Swift?

The Open Plymouth Brethren

Open Plymouth Brethren of the Philadelphia church period are not included in the denominations at CF under "Congregations" because the Brethren Movement desired only to be called Christians and to not divide the body of Christ falsely. The Open Plymouth Brethren were not the Exclusive Brethren since the latter were not Open.

Judaizing Christianity

On Aug. 3, 2006, I was told by a moderator I blasphemed the Holy Spirit for saying this, then was promptly banned:

According to Acts 15.22, at the council in Jerusalem the apostles and elders were all present. If the Sabbath day was important, surely it would have been taken up and decided on by the council. But this was not addressed. For the law and the prophets prophesied until John. Christ is now the sum of the law. Hence in the New Testament there is no command that we need to keep the Sabbath day. In Colossians we are told that the Sabbath day has passed away. Paul also maintained—in Romans 14—that to keep or esteem a day or not is something optional.  

Nothing in the New Covenant needs to be completed with the help of the Old Covenant. The Roman Church teaches that keeping the Lord’s Day is keeping the Sabbath day of Christianity. Yet this is to blend together Judaism and Christianity. Here come the Judaizers who try to bring the entire system of Judaism into Christianity. Yet if we must keep the Sabbath day, then we are no longer Christians. By accepting the Jewish system, we drop the status of being Christians and turn into pure Jews—even as the apostle Paul declared: “Ye observe days, and months, and seasons, and years. I am afraid of you, lest by any means I have bestowed labor upon you in vain” (Gal. 4.10-11).

666

Did you know (January 29, 2006) at christianforums.com, the main colors used were #339999, #993366, #660066, #993366 and #336699. In the event that Erwin Loh (its owner) changes these colors in the future, I wanted to preserve the numbers he chose for the mark of the beast (666). Surely this was not a coincidence with hundreds of thousands of colors to choose from. Erwin knows full well this verse: "Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast; for it is the number of a man: and his number is Six hundred and sixty and six." The mark of the beast points to Neron Kaisar which equals 666 in Aramaic in the language Christ spoke.

The Teaching

I took a poll in 2004 which showed more than 90% are historicalists at christianforums.com. Rev. 14.8 and the Rev. 17 are about the woman who sits on the beast that makes drunk the nations with the wine of the wrath of her fornications. This woman is "religious Rome" - the RCC. God will let Satan destroy it at the consummation of this age for its false teachings: sinless co-redemptrix, paying for indulgences, amillennialism, purgatory, adding books to the Bible, not allowing women to be Apostles and Elders, exceeding the boundary of Biblical locality, intermediary priesthood, many levels of hierarchy, popery, idols, and Judaizing Christianity with physical buildings, written codes and earthly promises.

Check this post out for which I was banned yet again:

Why can't calvinists repent from calvinism? the pride of believing they were premade for salvation like robots, or in other words, preprogrammed to choose. Why can't calvinists see this does not glorify God of the Bible?

Why can't calvinists love God's will to walk with those whom He predestinates by foreseeing (Rom. 8.29) who will come to the cross as helpless sinners, not by premaking us that way? Experientially Christians have discovered calvinists are blocked from accepting the truth: their consciences do not seem to have been quickened.

God does not give salvation arbitrarily irresistibly, limitedly, or unconditionally, but rather in the universal atonement offered, if man refuses God's grace he can resist the conditional offer of God's free gift.

God has infinite foreknowledge of when to give eternal life which is eternal at new birth. And though man is fallen he is not totally deprave otherwise he could never choose the cross that God asks us to choose, from being made in the image of God, so He will save us.

The Moderator accuses: "it is wrong to state all calvinists are unsaved."  But I did not say they are all unsaved.

The Holy Spirit is Needed

Erwin Loh is very busy. He wears many hats. What value is it to gain the world if you lose your soul in spreading yourself thin?

After being banned, I am told, "maybe it will help your attempts to reach people on other forums". Who needs more help than those at christianforums.com?

We Are Not Allowed to Speak the Truth

This post was removed but I was not banned for it:

There is much in the world that goes by the name of the house of God. The great historic Churches and denominations all claim that title. We would all agree that the Roman Catholic Church ("the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication...THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" Rev. 17.4,6) is a false house, based on a wrong principle of authority and built largely of dead bricks and not of living stones. The Protestant Church, in as far as it is evangelical, has more life. In it are many living stones, but they are individual and not united. Liberty of conscience is its specialty. There is much splendid material, but it is not built into a house. But quietly, in many places and largely unseen, God is raising up a vessel which is truly His house. It consists not of single outstanding individuals, whether great in preaching or revival or anything else, but in humble men and women who have been welded into one by the Cross.

Shechem must become Bethel. God must deliver us from the whole principle of individualism. He must save us from wanting to be outstanding individual Christians, and somehow make us one in His house. For it is the house of God that is His witness in the earth. Everyone knows how difficult it is for Christians to live together! When by the grace of God it happens, and continues to happen, even hell takes notice. But let us be careful. Is God's house a principle to be followed, or a life to be lived? Is it something to copy, or something to be? It would be easy, having seen the value of life together, to determine at all costs to apply the principles by which it should work. But this would not achieve the result. We must have the life of the Body, the shared life of Christ that comes from Him as Head, before we can abide by its principles. They cannot just be learned.

The harlot is either too presumptuous or too wicked. Though their conscience is not enlightened by God, the nations of the world cannot tolerate the practices of the Roman Church, such as,

• that after the bread is blessed by the priest it somehow is transubstantiated into the body of the Lord,

• that only the priests can read the Bible, popery,

• hierarchy of clergy and higher levels above,

• that confession must be made to the priests,

• that of the inquisition,

• rejecting women apostles and women elders,

• the selling of indulgences flourish,

• non-OSAS, having no faith God gives eternal life at new birth,

• amillennialism, the teaching that we are in a millennial peace now, and the book of Revelation is mostly fulfilled even though there is still war and despite the Bible saying in Rev. 20 the nations will no longer be deceived in the 1000 years: "deceive the nations no more" (v.3). When was a "third part of trees was burnt up" (8.7); a "third part of the sea became blood" (8.8); a "third part of the ships were destroyed" (8.9); a "third part of the rivers" been fallen upon (8.9); a "third part of the waters became wormwood" (8.11); a "third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise" (8.12); an army amassed in the middle east "two hundred thousand thousand" (Rev. 9.16); a "third part of men killed" (v.18) on earth?, and

• worse of all, having no faith to believe Jesus Christ can return in Person to reign on Earth with His overcomer believers for the millennial kingdom (Jude 14,15; Rev. 20.2-7).

Yet there are many other mean and treacherous acts practiced by her which even the nations cannot stand which causes her to be allowed to be destroyed in the Tribulation. God will allow this. It is even His wrath. It is an inevitability so that there is no trace of her in the millennial reign with an iron rod-mentioned 3 times in Revelation. On the other hand, because of her good, since in the Roman Church there can yet be found such truths taught as the Trinity, Jesus the Son of God, the Virgin Birth, the belief in the Lord’s death, resurrection and ascension, and so forth. She still belongs to Christ in name (superficially, nominally, not in life), and therefore the nations hate her and do away with her. According to God's divine providence none can stop what is going to happen to the Roman Catholic Church, for "she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication" (Rev. 14.8). 

There is a school of thought which maintains that Babylon points only to political Rome, not to religious Rome. This concept, though, is erroneous. If Babylon only refers to political Rome, why should “fallen” be mentioned twice in Rev. 14.8 and 16.19? For the event represented by the word “fallen” in 14.8 happens before the setting up of the image of the beast; therefore it is an event occurring during the first three and a half years. But the “fallen” (“fell”) told about in 16.19 takes place at the time of the seventh bowl, that is to say, after the setting up of the image of the beast. Hence there must be two different aspects of Babylon in view. This fits in perfectly with both religious Rome (since “Babylon” means confusion, and this confusion prevails in the realm of religion) and political Rome (since “Rome” in Hebrew means “the one who exalts himself”, and how she exalts herself in opposition to God).

Pray for the soon return of Christ to dismantle religious Rome when His parousia begins at the start of the last week consummation of this age at first rapture (Rev. 3.10,7.9; Luke 21.36). Praise the Lord for this discernment!

Another posts removed and caused subsequent banning:

Since all that is born of the flesh is flesh, everyone is born into sin including Mary; that is why we find Mary being selfish in the Bible and sinning. I count no less than 5 times, yet the RC says Mary is sinless.

It is wrong to disallow women to be preachers, pastors and leaders in the church, for there was at least one female apostle recorded in the Bible. I believe making Mary sinless is an appeasement to women to not allow them to be ministers in the RC. Should we accept intermediary priesthood of men or can we all go directly to God?

Paying for indulgences. Isn't this just a money making scheme? Is the Church to be centered in Rome or in Jerusalem? Is Peter the rock or Jesus? Which rock is bigger? Jesus will reign from Jerusalem, not from Rome. He will destroy religious Rome.

 

which was in the thread

The Roman Church - is this a cult? on 05-14-2007

What I find even more disturbing, the word "biblocality" is banned from christianforums.com. You'll get text replacing it that says [Wash your mouth] whether you use this word in private messages or elsewhere on the forums. That's Fahrenheit 451.

The above described behavior and teaching of the administrators and moderators at christianforums.com will be its downfall. In as much as this is a prophetic message, a person can change, even Erwin Loh; but the Bible says religious Rome will not change. Christ will need to return to destroy not only political Rome, but also religious Rome. These are solemn words.

Troy